2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues and options for a Martian calendar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correction to resolve this problem was implemented for ModelE2, Earth paleoclimate studies (Chandler et al 2013), and is also used by ROCKE-3D. (Allison 1997;Allison & McEwen 2000;Gangale 1986Gangale , 1997Gangale & Dudley-Rowley 2005). Here the priority is to simplify interpretation of seasonal and diurnal diagnostics, and is similar to the approach in Richardson et al (2007).…”
Section: Dynamic Coupled Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A correction to resolve this problem was implemented for ModelE2, Earth paleoclimate studies (Chandler et al 2013), and is also used by ROCKE-3D. (Allison 1997;Allison & McEwen 2000;Gangale 1986Gangale , 1997Gangale & Dudley-Rowley 2005). Here the priority is to simplify interpretation of seasonal and diurnal diagnostics, and is similar to the approach in Richardson et al (2007).…”
Section: Dynamic Coupled Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other priority was for the new calendar to preserve, as much as possible, correspondence between planetary seasons, months, and days with that of Earth in terms of basic orbital characteristics. Note that other communities have designed planetary calendars (primarily for Mars) with quite different priorities such as preserving the number of days per month and the number of seconds per hour (Allison 1997;Allison & McEwen 2000;Gangale 1986Gangale , 1997Gangale & Dudley-Rowley 2005). Here the priority is to simplify interpretation of seasonal and diurnal diagnostics, and is similar to the approach in Richardson et al (2007).…”
Section: Calendar Changes For Modeling Other Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between the Mars Years and TES Mapping Years. It should be noted that some controversy surrounds the assignment of Mars Years [ Suran , 1997; Gangale and Dudley‐Rowley , 2005]. In this paper, we adopt the timekeeping standard put forth by Clancy et al [2000] and Smith [2004], which designates L S = 000 of Mars Year 0 on 11 April 1955.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%