2012
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues determining direct airways hyperresponsiveness in mice

Abstract: Airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is frequently a primary outcome in mouse models of asthma. There are, however, a number of variables that may affect the outcome of such measurements and the interpretation of the results. This article highlights issues that should be kept in mind when designing experiments using AHR as an outcome by reviewing techniques commonly used to assess AHR (unrestrained plethysmography and respiratory input impedance using forced oscillations), discussing the relationship between stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16] Because of the advantages of oscillometry, it was speculated that it might become the new standard by which lung function is assessed and, at the same time, increase our understanding of respiratory diseases in a way similar to how it revolutionized animal research. 17 Oscillometry is also an example where the same physiological measurements can be made in animal models as in human patients. Respiratory oscillometry has become the de facto standard technique used in the animal laboratory, 17 and the heterogeneity seen in allergic mouse lungs is similar to what is seen in human lungs as exemplified in Dr. Dandurand's section in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16] Because of the advantages of oscillometry, it was speculated that it might become the new standard by which lung function is assessed and, at the same time, increase our understanding of respiratory diseases in a way similar to how it revolutionized animal research. 17 Oscillometry is also an example where the same physiological measurements can be made in animal models as in human patients. Respiratory oscillometry has become the de facto standard technique used in the animal laboratory, 17 and the heterogeneity seen in allergic mouse lungs is similar to what is seen in human lungs as exemplified in Dr. Dandurand's section in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while care should be taken not to over-interpret these results until further validation is provided, it should also be noted that strategies are being proposed to increase the translational value of preclinical murine models. These include steps directed at standardizing lung function measurement techniques as well as introducing novel methods of assessing or reporting lung function, to which the present study adds (Stevenson et al, 2013;Walker et al, 2012;Lundblad 2012;Robichaud et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach is widely accepted, it has an important weakness, in that results are comparable only if identical protocols are used. While steps were recently made to standardize this widely used technique, as well as to increase the translational utility of AHR measurements in mice (22,36), variations in the aerosol generation or transport aspect of the protocol are common. The rationale for such variations is not disputed, as they may be required to address specific scientific questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no standardized procedure exists; therefore, protocol variations can frequently be found in the literature, even when the same measurement technique is used. Close scrutiny of a list of research articles where the forced oscillation technique, an invasive measurement approach referred by some as the "gold standard" for respiratory mechanics assessment (22), was used to evaluate AHR to aerosolized methacholine in mice commonly reveals variations affecting the aerosol generation or delivery aspect of the protocol (1,3,16,17,25,29,30,(33)(34)(35)37). For example, in the latter selection of articles, at least four different nebulizers were used, nebulization time varied from 4 to 90 s, and changes in the ventilation profile or modifications to the inspiratory line were sometimes introduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%