1977
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.8.4.583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in the evaluation of mental health services for children.

Abstract: After the introduction of an operational approach to program evaluation, this article focuses on the application of program evaluation to child mental health services. The current state of assessment plans and techniques is discussed, along with the complications unique to situations in which the client is a child. New directions emerging in the field and mandated by legislation are discussed in terms of implications for new program evaluation planning and the training of family service professionals. (25 ref)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also offered as a means of encouraging others to report their experiences in evaluation of this difficult area.Psychologists evaluating the effectiveness of their services in educational settings will be frustrated by the paucity of evaluation instruments or published reports of evaluation efforts. Koocher and Broskowski (1977), writing about issues in the evaluation of mental health services for children, reported finding only two high-quality studies of mental health service delivery (one in residential care and one dealing with short-term psychotherapy), which is consistent with the lack we found in regard to evaluation of school psychological services. Although there is a voluminous literature on accountability and evaluation in general, we could locate only four studies specifically oriented to school psychology.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is also offered as a means of encouraging others to report their experiences in evaluation of this difficult area.Psychologists evaluating the effectiveness of their services in educational settings will be frustrated by the paucity of evaluation instruments or published reports of evaluation efforts. Koocher and Broskowski (1977), writing about issues in the evaluation of mental health services for children, reported finding only two high-quality studies of mental health service delivery (one in residential care and one dealing with short-term psychotherapy), which is consistent with the lack we found in regard to evaluation of school psychological services. Although there is a voluminous literature on accountability and evaluation in general, we could locate only four studies specifically oriented to school psychology.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…How these services interact with one another and with what consequences is an enormously important issue, especially in light of concern over rising health care costs (Kilburg, 1978). Koocher and Broskowski (1977) discussed the interconnected quality of children's mental health services and the need for comprehensive evaluation of service networks. Their analysis could be applied to most if not all health care settings.…”
Section: Development and Evaluation Of Health Care Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THE AUTHORS ARE GRATEFUL to members of the Bellefaire/Jewish Children's Bureau National Advisory Board and board consultants whose collective advice is reflected in this article. CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS ARTICLE should be addressed to Kathleen Wells, Bellefaire/Jewish Children's Bureau, 22001 Fairmount Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44118. and practice in mental health service organizations of all types (Feldman, 1980;Koocher &Broskowski, 1977). 1 These calls have been based on the assumptions that (a) research conducted in academic settings has had relatively little impact on mental health services (Bergin & Strupp, 1972); (b) research can be used to improve services; and (c) this gap between scientific knowledge and clinical practice can be narrowed by means of involving clinicians in research and integrating research and treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%