There is a remarkable lack of information about evaluating the effectiveness of school psychological services. A 40-item questionnaire was developed and used to survey the opinions of all possible recipients of such services in a small rural school system. Questionnaire items were grouped into six broad categories (personal/professional qualities of the consultant, teacher involvement, assessment, written communication, parents, students). Results are discussed in terms of respondent satisfaction by category. The questionnaire should be useful for stimulating ideas for in-service training, as a reflection of the degree of satisfaction with the consultative process, and as an overall guide for improving consultative services. It is also offered as a means of encouraging others to report their experiences in evaluation of this difficult area.Psychologists evaluating the effectiveness of their services in educational settings will be frustrated by the paucity of evaluation instruments or published reports of evaluation efforts. Koocher and Broskowski (1977), writing about issues in the evaluation of mental health services for children, reported finding only two high-quality studies of mental health service delivery (one in residential care and one dealing with short-term psychotherapy), which is consistent with the lack we found in regard to evaluation of school psychological services. Although there is a voluminous literature on accountability and evaluation in general, we could locate only four studies specifically oriented to school psychology. This report describes our preliminary efforts at systematically gathering information about perceptions of services provided to all potential consumers of psychological consultation services in a rural school system.Tomlinson (1973,1974) described an accountability system in which an intervention-effectiveness rating was derived. This rating was based on the degree to which changes in target behaviors, described in the initial case consultation, were effected and maintained. Data were obtained from the person having the greatest opportunity to observe the target behavior, usually the classroom teacher. In addition to the effectiveness rating, Tomlinson's procedure provided information about types and frequencies of problems for which school psychologists were asked to offer formal recommendations for intervention. It also allowed estimates of the frequencies and types of cases in which recommendations were not carried out nor alternate plans developed. An obvious shortcoming of the Tomlinson study is that it relates to a relatively limited area of school psychology functioning. It clearly demonstrates, however, the need to use specific behavioral terms for recommendations, implementation, and evaluation.Conti and Bardon (1974) proposed a three-scale questionnaire (written communication, verbal communication, and personal effectiveness) for evaluation of compe-