2018
DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2018.1539307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in the integration of religious education and worldviews education in an intercultural context

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The history of use, including in education, of the core concepts 'religion' and 'worldviews', is an obstacle to renewing the subject to better reflect the lived lives of people today, and thus be more relevant. For example, it was found both in the English and Norwegian context that in practical teaching one worldview had a dominant position: the secular humanist worldview (Bråten and Everington 2019). For the part of Norway, this is underlined by Schjetne and Borchgrevink Hansen (2019) article 'Emplotting a privileged position.…”
Section: Final Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The history of use, including in education, of the core concepts 'religion' and 'worldviews', is an obstacle to renewing the subject to better reflect the lived lives of people today, and thus be more relevant. For example, it was found both in the English and Norwegian context that in practical teaching one worldview had a dominant position: the secular humanist worldview (Bråten and Everington 2019). For the part of Norway, this is underlined by Schjetne and Borchgrevink Hansen (2019) article 'Emplotting a privileged position.…”
Section: Final Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1960s, this model became increasingly challenged by the rising surge of secularization that was sweeping academia, theology, and philosophy (Jackson, 2013, p. 5). Lacking a national curriculum for religious education, many schools created their own courses, using such names as “Beliefs and Values,” “Religion,” “Belief and Religion,” and “Philosophy and Ethics.” Among the causes of this trend was the desire to create a more inclusive model of religious education (Bråten & Everington, 2018, pp. 7–8).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no room here to delve into the political debates on this, but there was a clear connection to each political party's general policies on religion and society (Andersland 2019). This decision of course did not satisfy all stakeholders and the debate continues (Bråten and Everington 2019). On the other hand, there have been no controversies over the subject 'Religion and Ethics' in upper secondary education, where the name has been unchanged since 1996 (from 1976-1996 it was called 'Religion') (Andreassen and Olsen 2015).…”
Section: The New Curriculum As Part Of the Norwegian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%