Istiqra al-manwi; multicultural judicial reasoning

Abstract

This article offers the istiqra’ al-ma’nāwī as multicultural-based judicial reasoning to answer the gap between the monocultural pattern of norms required by the codification of law and the multicultural based social-structure of Indonesian society. By using a legal philosophy approach, this study concludes that istiqra’ al-ma’nāwī is oriented to balance the interests (al-wasīlah) and the needs (al-ghāyah) as the basic framework for distinguishing relative and absolute values of law. The judicial reasoning style offered by istiqra’ al-ma’nāwī can be operationalized through moderating ethical contestation and formulating justice and legal certainty based on multiculturality. The operationalization is carried out through three stages: The first is konstatiring stage, where the judges use social reintegration as an optic to see if there is disrupted social risk, like identity superiority motives. The second is separating the original from the derivative goals. The original legal goal is to protect the rights of marginalized communities and equality, while the derivative legal goal is access to welfare and the rights of impunity. The third is konstituir stage, by considering the significance of social control outside the legal aspect.

Best Practice Review: Enhancing the Quality of Shariah Economist Scholars

“…Fifth, synthesis of findings from the analyzed literature and explanation of how to overcome gaps by applying identified best practices.Finally, the preparation of recommendations based on findings, focusing on concrete actions that can be taken by educational institutions, academics, practitioners, and other stakeholders to improve the quality development of Islamic economic scholars and support the Islamic industry. Through this method, research will provide a strong theoretical foundation and valuable guidance to support the development of the Islamic economy in the era of globalization [10].…”

Best Practices in Interconnecting Sharia Arbitration Norms: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Europe

“…Then, the rise of the Islamic economic movement in Indonesia was closely related to the struggle of Muslims to implement Sharia in the country. The debate about Sharia Islam began during the process of establishing Indonesia's state form, and the current ideology of Pancasila is a compromise that does not fully implement the principles of Sharia Islam [24].…”

Legal Disruption and Sharia Arbitration: Navigating Change, Measuring Impact, and Fostering Innovation

“…Transition to a New Dimension: Developing new legal doctrines that can address the challenges and opportunities presented by smart contracts. For example, a new legal framework may need to be developed to address issues related to smart contract enforcement [33].…”