It All Depends on What You Want to Believe: How Young Adults Navigate Religion and Science

Abstract

Background Religion and science are typically portrayed as fundamentally at odds and in competition over truth claims. Yet recent studies have shown that many Americans, including scientists, do not necessarily hold such a straightforward perspective on this complicated relationship. The majority of current studies have been limited in fully capturing the way people construct and understand the relationship between these domains given their predominant use of close-ended survey methodologies. Purpose This study seeks to enhance our knowledge of how people navigate religion and science issues by allowing young adults to respond to open-ended questions from semi-structured, in-depth interviews about how they navigate the domains of religion and science. Methods We analyze 214 qualitative, in-depth interviews with young adults who participated in Wave 3 of the National Study of Youth and Religion. Results Results confirm that a warfare model is not the dominant perspective among young adults today. Rather, analyses revealed five predominant themes among young adults: (1) They commonly construe this relationship in purely individualistic terms, believing people do and should sort the truth out for themselves; (2) They see the two as mutually deficient and therefore both are needed to answer different questions; (3) Their understanding of this relationship reduces to how one views the origins of the world; (4) They believe the two can actually be mutually supportive; and (5) Any contention between the two stems from institutional conflicts, primarily in the realm of education, not competing claims about fundamental truths. Conclusions and Implications Beliefs about religion and science among young adults are complex and not captured fully by close-ended survey questions. This question is clearly one that most young adults have considered and can articulate. Future research should consider how these beliefs are formulated and what influence they have on life outcomes.

Longtime Nemeses or Cordial Allies? How Individuals Mentally Relate Science and Religion

“…Prior literature suggests that religious individuals are more likely to uphold the compartment view and disagree with the conflict view Longest & Uecker, 2021;Vaidyanathan et al, 2016). Further, studies examining how students bring together religious explanations and evolution have found that the compartment view prevails as a sense-making strategy for reconciling science and religion (Shipman et al, 2002;Taber et al, 2011;Yasri & Mancy, 2012).…”

“…The complementary view reflects a belief that science and religion are autonomous belief systems that have similar (ontological and epistemological) features-which implies that they are compatible and reconcilable to a certain extent (Barbour, 2000;Haimila, 2020). Individuals who endorse the complementary view believe that scientific and religious explanations provide an accurate yet incomplete account of our everyday lives and that neither can fully explain everything (Alexander, 2007;Longest & Uecker, 2021). As such, they argue that scientific and religious explanations are necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the world (Barbour, 2000;Taber et al, 2011;Yasri & Mancy, 2012).…”

Christianity-science compatibility beliefs increase nonreligious individuals’ perceptions of Christians’ intelligence and scientific ability

“…This suggests that perceptions of conflict between religion and science are more reflective of a cultural conflict between religion and science than of personal conflict (McPhetres et al, 2021). Personal perspectives on the relationship between religion and science tend to be more nuanced than the conflict narrative belies (Longest and Uecker, 2021). When given the choice, Roman Catholics, Evangelical Protestants, and Mainline Protestants in America are more likely to endorse a collaboration (i.e.…”

Threatening Morality: Religious and Political Opposition to Science in the United States

“…Despite the persistence of the conflict narrative, there is little evidence that the public thinks about science and religion as broadly incompatible. Instead, recent studies find that perceived conflict between science and religion is much more limited than is often presumed (Longest and Ueker 2021). In fact, more people in the United States believe that science and religion can support one another than believe that they conflict with one another (Ecklund and Scheitle 2017).…”