“It is merely a paper tiger.” Battle for increased tobacco advertising regulation in Indonesia: content analysis of news articles

Abstract

ObjectiveAt the end of 2012, the Indonesian government enacted tobacco control regulation (PP 109/2012) that included stricter tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) controls. The PP did not ban all forms of TAPS and generated a great deal of media interest from both supporters and detractors. This study aims to analyse stakeholder arguments regarding the adoption and implementation of the regulation as presented through news media converge.DesignContent analysis of 213 news articles reporting on TAPS and the PP that were available from the Factiva database and the Google News search engine.SettingIndonesia, 24 December 2012–29 February 2016.MethodsArguments presented in the news article about the adoption and implementation of the PP were coded into 10 supportive and 9 opposed categories. The news actors presenting the arguments were also recorded. Kappa statistic were calculated for intercoder reliability.ResultsOf the 213 relevant news articles, 202 included stakeholder arguments, with a total of 436 arguments coded across the articles. More than two-thirds, 69% (301) of arguments were in support of the regulation, and of those, 32.6% (98) agreed that the implementation should be enhanced. Of 135 opposed arguments, the three most common were the potential decrease in government revenue at 26.7% (36), disadvantage to the tobacco industry at 18.5% (25) and concern for tobacco farmers and workers welfare at 11.1% (15). The majority of the in support arguments were made by national government, tobacco control advocates and journalists, while the tobacco industry made most opposing arguments.ConclusionsAnalysing the arguments and news actors provides a mapping of support and opposition to an essential tobacco control policy instrument. Advocates, especially in a fragmented and expansive geographic area like Indonesia, can use these findings to enhance local tobacco control efforts.

Raising generation ‘A’: a case study of millennial tobacco company marketing in Indonesia

“…This study provides evidence that PMI has made no such commitment to a smoke-free Indonesia. Indonesia’s growing cigarette market, coupled with weak tobacco control,34 has allowed PMI to employ both traditional marketing strategies and more engaging, interactive promotions on digital platforms 3 4. The internet and social media are an important part of the marketing and communication tools used by tobacco companies 4 10 19…”

Why is tobacco control progress in Indonesia stalled? - A qualitative analysis of interviews with tobacco control experts

“…Nevertheless, tobacco control efforts are progressing in Indonesia, both at the national and subnational level. There is increasing awareness of the need to reduce tobacco use and tobacco control is positively framed in the local media, [6] and more sub-national governments have been gradually adopting smoke-free regulations. However, many politicians still view tobacco control as an "outsider" agenda, partly because foreign donors do support some of the tobacco control advocacy campaigns and research.…”

“…[5] Conversely, tobacco industry proponents argue that tobacco control will cause economic harm through loss of revenue and depriving tobacco farmers and industry workers from earning a living. [6] A study of 1350 smallholder tobacco farmers in Indonesia showed that tobacco farming is not profitable for the farmer, most farmers are poor, and many suffer from green tobacco disease. [7] Similar to other settings, smoking prevalence in Indonesia is higher among the lower socio-economic quintiles.…”

Content Analysis of Cigarette Packs in Indonesia: Regulatory Non- Compliance and Product Promotion Advantage

“…Indonesia, a non-party country to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control still have issue with tobacco use where the smoking prevalence among youth age 10-18 rose from 7.2% in 2013 (Ministry of Health, 2013) to 9.1% in 2018 (Ministry of Health, 2018), far from the government's target to reduce the prevalence of youth age 10-18 by 5.4% in 2019. The country has only partial TAPS ban in its Government Regulation Number 109/2012 (Astuti & Freeman, 2017). Some few local governments have begun to include banning outdoor advertisement and cigarette display at POS in their Smoke Free Ordinances such as Jakarta and Bogor city.…”