2019
DOI: 10.1080/10538720.2019.1681340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It may be legal, but it is not treated equally”: marriage equality and well-being implications for same-sex couples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, samesex couples still experience unequal treatment and stigma in interpersonal interactions despite marriage equality. 11,44 Research has also found that community-level social climate (which was not assessed in the current study) is an important predictor of sexual minority health outcomes, 12,27,45 and supportive policy environments are more protective of sexual minority people's health in the context social climates that affirm their identities. 27 The health-promoting implications of concurrent improvements in policy and social climate may become more evident over time vis-à-vis shifts toward more affirming public attitudes and policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, samesex couples still experience unequal treatment and stigma in interpersonal interactions despite marriage equality. 11,44 Research has also found that community-level social climate (which was not assessed in the current study) is an important predictor of sexual minority health outcomes, 12,27,45 and supportive policy environments are more protective of sexual minority people's health in the context social climates that affirm their identities. 27 The health-promoting implications of concurrent improvements in policy and social climate may become more evident over time vis-à-vis shifts toward more affirming public attitudes and policies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Further, residence in states with policies that permit discrimination based on sexual orientation were associated with adverse health outcomes among sexual minorities. For example, prior to the 2015 extension of marriage rights to all same-sex couples in the U.S., research found greater evidence of psychological distress and worse self-reported health among sexual minorities living in states that prohibited same-sex marriage compared to those living in states that legalized it ( Carpenter et al, 2018 ; Frost and Fingerhut, 2016 ; Gonzales and Ehrenfeld, 2018 ; Hatzenbuehler et al, 2010 ; Kail et al, 2015 ; Kennedy and Dalla, 2020 ; Raifman et al, 2017 ; Riggle et al, 2009 ). Policy protections for sexual minorities appear to positively impact health outcomes among sexual minorities, but have no impact – or only modest positive impact – on heterosexuals ( Drabble et al, 2021 ; Hatzenbuehler et al, 2010 ; Solazzo et al, 2018 ; Titus et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, research with gay and lesbian couples has found a negative relationship between proximal minority stressors such as internalized homophobia and same-sex relationship quality (Li & Samp, 2019), as well as outness and relationship commitment (Totenhagen et al, 2018). On the contrary, research on distal stressors such as the change from access to marriage rights dependent on one’s geographic location to federal marriage equality found that partners in same-sex relationships perceived marriage rights as positively impacting their relationship (Kennedy & Dalla, 2019). Therefore, minority stress may be a mediator of the distal stressor of unequal parentage and relationship satisfaction, which, in turn, may be associated with parental stress.…”
Section: Lgbtq Parentingmentioning
confidence: 99%