2015
DOI: 10.14318/hau5.1.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It’s a conspiracy theoryandclimate change”

Abstract: This article traces the introduction of the category of climate change into the Indian Himalaya. Climate change emerged as an explanation for recurring incidences of humananimal conflict and the disappearance of a protected species through the labors of the local state bureaucracy. Even as the narratives on climate change were being imbued with expert authority, counternarratives dealing with the very same phenomena voiced by long-term residents of the Himalayas were summarily dismissed by the state as constit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter-ontological relationships are often characterized by power asymmetries; those who are better equipped, including the state, often try to dominate others' ontological positions (Mathur 2015). In the case I explored, open conflicts-concerning climate change in the narrow sense-were still rare.…”
Section: Inter-ontological Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inter-ontological relationships are often characterized by power asymmetries; those who are better equipped, including the state, often try to dominate others' ontological positions (Mathur 2015). In the case I explored, open conflicts-concerning climate change in the narrow sense-were still rare.…”
Section: Inter-ontological Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some notice that conspiracy theories might be actually true (Dentith 2018;Räikkä 2009) or prompt investigations that lead to the discovery of the truth (Culloty 2021). Others express concern that a focus on falseness might lead to the exclusion of certain forms of thought (Bratich 2008;Hellinger 2019;Husting and Orr 2007) and neglect the power relations involved in the truth arbitrages (Mathur 2015;McCarthy Brown 2003;Pelkmans and Machold 2011). To account for imbalances of power in conflicts over truth, some scholars postulate an approach to conspiracy theories as narratives contesting hegemonic knowledge (Boyer 2006;Keenan 2006).…”
Section: Researching Conflicts Over Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in Ladakh by Bhatia et al (2017) show that local people's perception about large carnivores in the snow-packed regions depended on their degree of "religiosity." Another case study from the Chamoli district in India's Uttarakhand state unravels the divergence in the discourse among different stakeholders (Mathur 2015). Here, the state narrative invokes climate change, especially, reduced winter snowfall, as the main driver for increasing trends in human-animal conflict (both with leopards and bears) and the disappearance of musk deer, while local narratives speak of a state which is indifferent, corrupt, and in cahoots with poachers and private companies-and in the process is destroying the ecosystem of these endangered species.…”
Section: Habitat Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%