2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5949.00205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's a Nice Idea, but it's not actually Real: Assessing the Objects and Activities of Design

Abstract: This paper begins with an overview of the debate between the ideas of 'art' and 'industry' in design education, and the relationship of this debate to liberal and vocational pedagogic approaches in the education of designers. These debates are investigated with supporting examples drawn from tertiary level design education assessment conversations (known as critiques, or 'crits') using techniques drawn from Conversation Analysis. The analysis reveals how expectations and perceptions of design activity are arti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sacks (1999); Heylighten & Neuckermans (1999); Uluoglu (2000); Oak (2000)) examines resource-intensive studio experiences in which students' individual progression during a project is served by frequent, intensive, personal attention from a studio master. For example, Goldschmidt, Hochman and Dafni characterize the studio experience in architecture as typically, 'meeting two or three times a week for a number of hours, during which students present and discuss their work in progress with their teachers and sometimes also with classmates and guests ' (2010: p. 285).…”
Section: Approach To Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sacks (1999); Heylighten & Neuckermans (1999); Uluoglu (2000); Oak (2000)) examines resource-intensive studio experiences in which students' individual progression during a project is served by frequent, intensive, personal attention from a studio master. For example, Goldschmidt, Hochman and Dafni characterize the studio experience in architecture as typically, 'meeting two or three times a week for a number of hours, during which students present and discuss their work in progress with their teachers and sometimes also with classmates and guests ' (2010: p. 285).…”
Section: Approach To Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, employing an inductive analysis of critics' language, Dannels and Martin describe a typology of nine types of feedback and suggest that these feedback types differ (some more egalitarian, others more instructive) based on the level of the studio and the preprofessional goals that accompany each level. Oak (2000) also suggests that feedback occurring in the critique reflects tensions between instructors' and students' assumptions of design and design education*recognizing that the explicit and implicit language within feedback teaches students about professional expectations. Finally, many researchers suggest the important role feedback plays in the construction of particular communicative climates during the critique (e.g., Anthony, 1991;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, critiques were central spaces that served as a rite of passage into the culture*/or tribe, if you will*/of ''designers.'' These results add to Oak's (2000) analysis of the critique*/suggesting that the critique is not only a place where students could be socialized into the expectations of the professional design context (Oak, 2000) but also a place where students could be socialized into the norms, values, and culture of that context. Second, as rites of passage, these oral genres were conceptualized as dialogic and performative.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, Morton and O'Brien (2005) empirically illustrate how a genre-based approach to cross-curricular work results in complex discipline-specific understandings of the linguistic and rhetorical features of effective critiques. Additionally, Oak (2000) illustrates how talk occurring in the critique reflects tensions between the instructor's and student's assumptions of design and design education. She suggests that the explicit and implicit language of the crit helps to shape the students as, through talking and hearing talk about their objects, the students learn what to expect of design and what is expected of them if they are to become professional designers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%