It’s about Time! CEOs’ Temporal Dispositions, Temporal Leadership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship

Abstract

How CEOs think and feel about time may have a big influence on their firms' strategies. We examine how two distinct CEO temporal dispositions-time urgency (the feeling of being chronically hurried) and pacing style (one's pattern of effort over time in working toward deadlines)-each influence corporate entrepreneurship, a key strategic behavior. We propose that CEOs' temporal leadership-how they manage the temporal aspects of top management teams' activities-mediates the relationships between their temporal dispositions and corporate entrepreneurship-firms' innovation, corporate venturing, and strategic renewal activities. Using a sample of 129 small and medium-sized Chinese firms, we find that CEOs' time urgency is positively related to their temporal leadership, which in turn is positively related to corporate entrepreneurship. We also examine the effects of three distinct pacing styles: earlyaction, meaning the CEO exerts the most effort early in the task process and relaxes as the deadline nears; steady-action, meaning the CEO spreads out effort evenly across the time allotted; and deadline-action, meaning the CEO is most active as the deadline nears. We find that the deadline-action style inhibits CEOs' temporal leadership, but the steady-action and early-action styles have similar effects on their temporal leadership. This study explicates the dispositional basis of executives' subjective views of time, demonstrating how CEOs' temporal dispositions shape firms' behaviors.

Born to Take Risk? The Effect of CEO Birth Order on Strategic Risk Taking

“…These studies have focused on executive personality captured through the Big Five dimensions (Herrmann & Nadkarni, 2014;Nadkarni & Herrmann, 2010), as well as other personality constructs, such as narcissism, hubris, and overconfidence (e.g., Chatterjee & Hambrick, 2007;Chen, Crossland, & Luo, 2015). More recent work in this area has focused on CEOs' values, such as political ideology (e.g., Christensen, Dhaliwal, Boivie, & Graffin, 2015), and cognitive aspects, such as temporal disposition (e.g., Chen & Nadkarni, 2017).…”

Corporate entrepreneurship of emerging market firms: current research and future directions

“…While, to the authors' knowledge, the studies that focus on "organizational culture" and CE in EMFs are quite limited, the list increases when we consider the role of leadership as a subset of the organizational culture of the firm. Considering the role of leadership in the firm in a notable study in Administrative Science Quarterly, Chen and Nadkami (2017), by focusing on small-and medium-sized Chinese firms, demonstrated that a chief executive officer's (CEO) temporal leadership plays a mediating role between the CEO's temporal dispositions and CE in terms of innovation, corporate venturing and strategic renewal activities. In a similar fashion, in a study of small and medium enterprises in Pakistan, Shafique and Kalyar (2018) showed that the type of leadership, in this case transformational leadership, positively affects CE and its dimensions of innovation, new business venturing, self-renewal, proactivity and risk-taking.…”

Digital Capability and Innovation Strategy to Develop the Performance and Competitive Advantages of Fashion Smes in Jakarta, Indonesia

“…Innovation strategy is the structural support to have innovation. The development of the innovation strategy would improve the capability of the company's management to have company's innovation (Chen & Nadkarni, 2017). Innovation refers to the tendency of the companies to do and support the new ideas, newness, experimentation and creative process that could have a new product, service and technology process as product (Covin & Lumpkin, 2011;Kuratko, 2010).…”