2011
DOI: 10.1086/661119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's All Who You Know: The Evolution Of Socially Cued Anticipatory Plasticity As A Mating Strategy

Abstract: Selection has led to the evolution of a variety of different mating strategies, each adapted to different competitive challenges. But what happens if the competitive challenges depend on the social environment? Here we discuss and review examples of socially cued anticipatory plasticity: irreversible developmental tactics in which resource allocation during the juvenile stage is altered to develop an appropriate phenotype for the competitive or mate choice environment that an individual encounters when mature.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
130
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study shows that female fairy-wrens increased teaching effort to embryos after receiving acoustical information about the threat of brood parasitism during incubation. In a separate study, we showed increased predation risk at nests with high incubation call rate [26], which likely explains why female fairy-wrens only increase call rate when the risk of cuckoo parasitism is high. The benefits to the embryos of learning could be numerous, including a lifelong trajectory of learning in unpredictable environments [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This study shows that female fairy-wrens increased teaching effort to embryos after receiving acoustical information about the threat of brood parasitism during incubation. In a separate study, we showed increased predation risk at nests with high incubation call rate [26], which likely explains why female fairy-wrens only increase call rate when the risk of cuckoo parasitism is high. The benefits to the embryos of learning could be numerous, including a lifelong trajectory of learning in unpredictable environments [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The responses of males to the presence of same sex conspecifics can include differential investment in reproductive tissue during development (Kasumovic and Brooks 2011), strategic ejaculation of sperm (Wedell et al 2002), and behavioral plasticity (Bretman et al 2011a). In D. melanogaster, males increase mating duration ) and modulate ejaculate composition following exposure to a conspecific potential rival male (Wigby et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female mating preferences may also vary depending on extrinsic factors such as predation risks (Forsgren 1992;Hedrick and Dill 1993;Johnson and Basolo 2003), the presence of competitors (Fawcett and Johnstone 2003), social experience (Hebets 2003;Tudor and Morris 2009;Rutledge et al 2010;Bailey 2011), and the physical environment (Gordon and Uetz 2011). Specifically, the effects of previous social experience on subsequent mate preferences, an example of Bsocially cued anticipatory plasticity^or SCAP (Kasumovic and Brooks 2011), have been increasingly studied over the last decade due to the impact of female preferences on the evolution Communicated by M. Elgar of mating signals (Jennions and Petrie 1997;Kasumovic and Brooks 2011;Verzijden et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCAP in mating preferences based on the availability of potential mates would presumably be selected for over time, as long as social conditions of the past (e.g., high encounter rates or encounters with multiple males) accurately convey what the future social environment will be like. Consequently, SCAP would lead to behaviors (e.g., maintaining strict preferences for males with particular phenotypes or relaxing preferences) that are advantageous during mating decisions (Kasumovic and Brooks 2011). This study aims to determine whether SCAP in female selectivity is best predicted by previous experience with varying encounter rates and/or simultaneous encounters with multiple males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%