It's better than stealing: informal street selling in Brussels

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to gain insight into the organisation of informal street selling in the capital of Belgium, its association with formal and illegal selling and the perceptions, choices and decisions of the sellers. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative approach (case study) was employed, including interviews, observations and document analyses. Findings – The results point to different types of informal street selling, which are mainly executed by (illegal) migrants as a survival strategy. The case illustrates the different interrelations between the formal, informal and criminal economy. Notwithstanding the precarious situation of many informal sellers (informal), street selling is preserved by the government as a social safety net. Moreover, informal selling is neutralised by the suggestion that it is a better alternative than stealing or committing crimes which inflict physical harm and feelings of insecurity. Research limitations/implications – The results have limited generalisability, but are theoretically and methodologically important. Practical implications – Implications for migration policy (e.g. more preventative actions in countries of origin, shorter procedures, development of migration regulations accounting for other policy domains, e.g. employment market). Originality/value – The study fills a gap in the literature as there is limited empirical research on informal economy and Belgian informal street selling. Results are discussed in relation to international literature, thus overcoming a purely national perspective.

Tackling enterprise in the informal economy: an introductory overview

“…It would also enable a "high road" rather than "low road" approach by shifting toward greater regulatory standards on working conditions such as health and safety and labour standards (Grabiner, 2000;Renooy et al, 2004;Williams and Windebank, 1998). Meanwhile, for informal enterprises, the key benefits are that they escape the pressure to enter exploitative relationships with the formal economy (Gallin, 2001;Williams and Windebank, 1998) and achieve the same levels of legal protection as formal enterprises (Boels, 2014;Bruns et al, 2011;ILO, 2014;Morris and Polese, 2014). They are also able to secure formal intellectual property rights for their products and processes (De Beer et al, 2013) and overcome the structural impediments that prevent them growing, such as their lack of access to advice and support as well as capital (ILO, 2014).…”

Tackling the Propensity towards Undeclared Work: Some Policy Lessons from Croatia

“…In this paper, and reflecting the consensus in the literature, undeclared work is defined as paid work which is legal in all respects other than it is not declared to the authorities for tax, social security or labour law purposes (Aliyev 2015;Boels 2014;European Commission 2007;OECD 2012;Polese and Rodgers 2011;Williams 2014a,b). If it is not legal in all other respects, it is not part of the undeclared economy.…”

Beyond the marginalisation thesis: evaluating participation in informal sector entrepreneurship

“…As the ILO (2002) find, in sub-Saharan Africa 70 per cent of those operating in the informal sector are doing so on a self-employed basis, 62 per cent in North Africa, 60 per cent in Latin America and 59 per cent in Asia. Subsequently, the self-employed have been similarly shown to constitute the vast majority of the informal labour force in advanced western economies (Boels, 2014;Katungi et al 2006;Small Business Council, 2004;Snyder, 2004;Williams, 2014a,b; and also post-socialist transition economies (Aliyev, 2015;Chavdarova, 2014;Likic-Brboric et al, 2013;Round et al, 2008;Williams, 2014c;Williams and Horodnic, 2015;.…”