2021
DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2020.1862984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘It’s hard to be what you can’t see’ - gender representation in marketing’s academic journals

Abstract: This commentary explores gender representation in marketing's academic journals. We explore three key areas a) the gender composition of editorial boards, b) special issue celebrations and c) awards. We highlight how in 2020, 68% of editorial board positions are held by male colleagues, and consider the consequences of this both in terms of providing role models for female academics -"it's hard to be what you can't see" (Wright, 2015) but also in there being less opportunities for women to avail of key indicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the marketing academy, this has raised questions about pedagogy (Sutton-Brady, 2021; Tadajewski, 2022), conferences (Vander Schee & DeLong, 2022), workload and burnout (Taylor & Frechette, 2022) and what is studied in our field and the impact it has on the world around us (Chandy et al, 2021). Meanwhile, injustices and inequalities persist in the marketing academy, including in academic journals, awards and conferences (Prothero & McDonagh, 2021; Prothero & Tadajewski, 2021). A recently published marketing climate survey highlights persistent gendered and racial inequities in our field (Galak & Kahn, 2021), with important suggestions and directions offered to further interrogate and address these issues (Bradford & Perry, 2021; Dobscha et al, 2021).…”
Section: Marketing Academia: a Changing Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the marketing academy, this has raised questions about pedagogy (Sutton-Brady, 2021; Tadajewski, 2022), conferences (Vander Schee & DeLong, 2022), workload and burnout (Taylor & Frechette, 2022) and what is studied in our field and the impact it has on the world around us (Chandy et al, 2021). Meanwhile, injustices and inequalities persist in the marketing academy, including in academic journals, awards and conferences (Prothero & McDonagh, 2021; Prothero & Tadajewski, 2021). A recently published marketing climate survey highlights persistent gendered and racial inequities in our field (Galak & Kahn, 2021), with important suggestions and directions offered to further interrogate and address these issues (Bradford & Perry, 2021; Dobscha et al, 2021).…”
Section: Marketing Academia: a Changing Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, female academics experience ‘obscured service burdens’ (Docka-Filipek & Stone, 2021) since academic housework jobs are unequally distributed to women over male colleagues (Heijstra et al, 2017). In other words, women take on the work that holds departments together, yet the labour does not count for promotion (Prothero & McDonagh, 2021).…”
Section: Gendered Constraints In the Academic Career Journeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, underrepresentation is ‘prominent’ among ‘invited speakers, moderators, and award recipients’ (Cordonnier et al, 2019, p. e149). Prothero and McDonagh (2021, p. 5) noted that ‘not all journals have awards, but for those who do they are either named after celebrated male marketing academics (47%) or not named at all (53%)’. Awards offered in the future should be named after female academics, to address the identified shortfall in recognising award representation currently in marketing academia (Prothero & McDonagh, 2021).…”
Section: Gendered Constraints In the Academic Career Journeymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations