‘It's leaflet, leaflet, leaflet then, “see you later”’: black Caribbean women's perceptions of perinatal mental health care

Edge, Dawn

doi:10.3399/bjgp11x567063

Cited by 39 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our findings are also consistent with prior studies which illustrate that many women perceive their obstetric providers and staff as unsupportive, unavailable [30,32,33,40,41,44,49–51] and inadequately trained in depression assessment and treatment [49,50]. …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Perinatal women report that they are afraid to disclose mental health concerns due to fears of stigma, losing parental rights and being judged as an unfit mother [27–48]. Many women perceive obstetric providers and staff as unsupportive, unavailable [30,32,33,40,41,44,49–51] and inadequately trained in depression assessment and treatment [49,50]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient’s views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Byatt

Biebel

Friedman³

et al. 2013

General Hospital Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The objectives were to examine patients’ perspectives on patient-, provider- and systems-level barriers and facilitators to addressing perinatal depression in outpatient obstetric settings. We also compare the views of patients and perinatal health care professionals. Method Four 90-min focus groups were conducted with women 3–36 months after delivery (n=27) who experienced symptoms of perinatal depression, anxiety or emotional distress. Focus groups were transcribed, and resulting data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results Barriers to addressing perinatal depression included fear of stigma and loss of parental rights, negative experiences with perinatal health care providers and lack of depression management knowledge/skills among professionals. Facilitators included psychoeducation, peer support and training for professionals. Conclusions Patients perceive many multilevel barriers to treatment that are similar to those found in our previous similar study of perinatal health care professionals’ perspectives. However, patients and professionals do differ in their perceptions of one another. Interventions would need to close these gaps and include an empathic screening and referral process that facilitates discussion of mental health concerns. Interventions should leverage strategies identified by both patients and professionals, including empowering both via education, resources and access to varied mental health care options.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient’s views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Byatt

Biebel

Friedman³

et al. 2013

General Hospital Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nine explored this concept in minority groups living in the UK (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Three studies had mixed samples (24)(25)(26), five had predominantly White samples (27-31) and seven did not report ethnicity (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seeking help for perinatal psychological distress: a meta-synthesis of women’s experiences

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ten studies were conducted in the UK, 304,[306][307][308][309][310][311][312][313][314][315]319,321,322,324 seven studies were conducted in the USA, 286,292,[296][297][298]302,303,318,320 one in Switzerland, 316 one in Canada, 317 one in Norway, 323 one in India, 325 one in China 305 and one in multiple centres. 7 …”

Section: Study Locationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 Fifteen studies provided data from participants who were part of the general population in the country of study, whereas the remaining studies examined evidence from minority groups within the country of study. The minority groups either were a culturally different group based within the country of study (n = 5) 304,[306][307][308][309][310][311]314,318 or were a selective group (n = 3). 292,[296][297][298]315 For details of participant characteristics, see Appendix 9.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

Morrell

Sutcliffe

Booth

et al. 2016

Health Technol Assess

101

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression C Jane Morrell, 1 * Paul Sutcliffe, 2 Andrew Booth, 3 John Stevens, 3 This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 11/95/03. The contractual start date was in November 2012. The draft report began editorial review in August 2014 and was accepted for publication in June 2015. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department ...

show abstract

‘It's leaflet, leaflet, leaflet then, “see you later”’: black Caribbean women's perceptions of perinatal mental health care

Cited by 39 publications

References 21 publications

Patient’s views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Patient’s views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Seeking help for perinatal psychological distress: a meta-synthesis of women’s experiences

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About