2017
DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2017.1316534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It's Like Fighting for Survival”: How Rejected Black African Asylum Seekers Experience Living Conditions in an Eastern German State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion about changing the system of state-provided reception centres with restrictive and even repressive regulations limiting asylum seekers’ autonomy is subject to a lively debate in reports and studies. A study on asylum seekers in an eastern state in Germany emphasized on the perceived negative consequences of repressive regulations and various socio-environmental challenges during the asylum seeking process [ 59 ]. Based on a study of accommodation centres in the Czech Republic, a report by the International Organization for Migration labelled these centres as long-term “confinement” and “tools of migration control”, stating that in reception centers, control and assistance go hand in hand, creating a repressive environment for asylum seekers [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discussion about changing the system of state-provided reception centres with restrictive and even repressive regulations limiting asylum seekers’ autonomy is subject to a lively debate in reports and studies. A study on asylum seekers in an eastern state in Germany emphasized on the perceived negative consequences of repressive regulations and various socio-environmental challenges during the asylum seeking process [ 59 ]. Based on a study of accommodation centres in the Czech Republic, a report by the International Organization for Migration labelled these centres as long-term “confinement” and “tools of migration control”, stating that in reception centers, control and assistance go hand in hand, creating a repressive environment for asylum seekers [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asylum seekers’ experience of financial hardship was also reported in the United Kingdom where the majority of asylum seekers are needy upon arrival [ 61 ]. A recent qualitative study on asylum seekers’ experiences with living conditions in Eastern Germany also highlights women’s perceived lack of resources and multitude of socio-environmental challenges during the asylum seeking process [ 59 ]. Disposing of limited financial means is burdening for asylum seekers and results in limited consumption potential, a social determinant of health at the meso level, with perceived negative consequences during pregnancy and early motherhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system forces migrants to live a “parallel universe” (Selders 2009:11): their social interactions are minimal and they are under the permanent control of public authorities. As shown by Scott (2018) and Täubig (2009), this system leads to deep and widespread feelings of isolation, humiliation and fear among migrants. These feelings are reflected in the testimonies collected by activists involved in the Caravan.…”
Section: Fighting Marginalisation: the Caravan For The Rights Of Refumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A central dimension of this system is the restriction to their mobility, which leads to their exclusion from the public space. For example, this system is created by the forced geographical distribution of asylum seekers across the German territory, in collective accommodation centres that are located in remote areas (McDonough 2009; Scott 2018). This spatial and social marginalisation is reinforced by the fact that asylum seekers do not have the right to work.…”
Section: Fighting Marginalisation: the Caravan For The Rights Of Refumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are neither fully legal nor fully illegal pending a definitive ruling on their application, 871,662 of which were pending at the end of 2018 (Eurostat, 2019a). While waiting (often for years) they are typically denied the right to work and to move freely (Craig, 2013;Hampshire, 2013: 69-76;Scott, 2018), though the EU's Reception Condition Directive (2013) obliges member states to provide some basic services such as emergency healthcare, family unity or children's education (Ataç, 2019). When finally denied asylum (around 558,000 in 2018), many flee authorities and therefore fall into the ranks of the undocumented (European Asylum Support Office, 2019).…”
Section: Regular Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%