2014
DOI: 10.1068/a46300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It's Not a Bairro, is It?”: Subsistence Sociability and Focused Avoidance in a Public Housing Estate

Abstract: This paper draws on a multidisciplinary study of state policy, housing provision, and the social question in Porto, Portugal, over the past half century, combining ethnography, in-depth interviews, and a survey of local families. It examines the trajectory of one of the city's largest and most notorious public housing estates to map out how transformations in its social composition and in the mix of state action have affected how residents deal with the disparaging public image attached to their place of resid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present analysis, from an individual level perspective, family ties were described as a source of emotional, financial, instrumental support that can affect several determinants of health; from a collective level perspective, social cohesion is lacking in the community. Pereira and Queiros [49] has also indicated privatization of public spaces, the avoidance of common areas and the elaboration of micro differences in a similar settlement, in Porto, Portugal. Thus, we stress that the predominance of family ties (i.e., bonding social capita) has important implications in the future assessment of social capital and in the interpretation of its effects on health in different settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present analysis, from an individual level perspective, family ties were described as a source of emotional, financial, instrumental support that can affect several determinants of health; from a collective level perspective, social cohesion is lacking in the community. Pereira and Queiros [49] has also indicated privatization of public spaces, the avoidance of common areas and the elaboration of micro differences in a similar settlement, in Porto, Portugal. Thus, we stress that the predominance of family ties (i.e., bonding social capita) has important implications in the future assessment of social capital and in the interpretation of its effects on health in different settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the effects of territorial segregation and stigmatization on health adds another relative dimension to the discussion about the effects of neighborhood deprivation on health [45][46][47][48][49][50]. These studies have highlighted the relevance of neighborhoods beyond the physical and social conditions within a geographical area, bringing the notion that neighborhoods, like individuals are positioned and further differentiated in the social space in relation to other areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who acknowledge their neighborhood's negative image may disassociate themselves from it, asserting that they do not contribute to it. Some employ a related distancing strategy, limiting their interactions within the neighborhood and retreating into their homes (Garthwaite & Bambra, 2018; Graham et al, 2016; Kelaher et al, 2010; Pereira & Queiros, 2014; Pinkster, 2014; Wanka, 2018). Another coping mechanism entails the construction of micro‐reputations at a more granular scale, enabling people to point to other streets in the neighborhood which are worse than their own (Arthurson, 2013; Bush et al, 2001; Pinkster, 2014).…”
Section: The Effects Of Neighborhood Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the strategies that is particularly important to discuss is that of retreat into the private sphere. Pereira and Queirós (2014), for example, found this strategy to be deployed by residents of a public housing estate Figure 2. Strategies to cope with territorial stigma (Wacquant et al 2014).…”
Section: Socio-spatial Exclusion From a Sociological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%