Background
Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer have been attributed to patients’ differential access to care. We aimed to study treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer in the equal access Military Health System (MHS) to better understand potential racial disparities.
Methods
We accessed the MilCanEpi database to study a cohort of patients aged 18 and older who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2014. Receipt of guideline recommended treatment per tumor stage, cancer recurrence, and all-cause death were compared between Non-Hispanic White and Black patients using multivariable regression models with associations expressed as odds (AORs) or hazard ratios (AHRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
The study included 171 Black and 845 White patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Overall, there were no differences in receipt of guideline concordant treatment (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.29), recurrence (AHR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.85, 2.12), or survival (AHR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.77, 1.54) for Black patients compared to White patients. However, Black patients aged <50 years at diagnosis (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13, 0.90) or with stage III or IV tumors (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.64) were less likely to receive guideline recommended treatment than White patients in stratified analysis.
Conclusions
In the equal access MHS, while there were no overall racial disparities in rectal cancer treatment or clinical outcomes between Black and White patients, disparities among those with early-onset or late-stage rectal cancers were noted. This suggests factors other than access to care may play a role in the observed disparities and warrants further research.