2020
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.570810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It’s Not Easy Being Green: Behavior, Morphology, and Population Structure in Urban and Natural Populations of Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis) Lizards

Abstract: Selection on behavior, signaling, and morphology can be strongly affected by variation in habitat type. Consequently, populations inhabiting different environments can exhibit divergent phenotypes as a result of either habitat-specific selection or plasticity. Urban habitats in particular represent different challenges for organisms adapted for rural environments, including disparate complements of predators and competitors, resource availability, and habitat complexity. In this paper, I review work aimed at u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the differences in home ranging between the Washington Square Park population and other populations is unclear. It could be driven by differences in the type and quality of habitat, which can be substantial (e.g., [Edwards & Lailvaux, 2012; Irschick et al., 2005]) or by general differences between the urban nature of the Washington Square Park population and the rural populations studied by Jenssen and others (Lailvaux, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the differences in home ranging between the Washington Square Park population and other populations is unclear. It could be driven by differences in the type and quality of habitat, which can be substantial (e.g., [Edwards & Lailvaux, 2012; Irschick et al., 2005]) or by general differences between the urban nature of the Washington Square Park population and the rural populations studied by Jenssen and others (Lailvaux, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between urban and non-urban populations of anole species have provided evidence for differences in morphology [57][58][59][60][61], reproductive traits [57], and population structure [60,62]. Differences between urban and non-urban populations of anoles have also been reported for territorial and sexual behavior [31,37,63,64], locomotor performance [37,65], foraging behavior [66], and substrate choice [67,68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%