2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It’s Not Easy Being Green: Supporting Collaborative “Green Design” Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we build on a paradigm for dynamic support for group learning that has proven effective for improving interaction and learning in a series of online group learning studies conducted in classroom settings. In particular we refer to using tutorial dialogue agent technology to provide interactive support within a synchronous collaborative chat environment (Kumar et al, 2007;Chaudhuri et al, 2008;Chaudhuri et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Ai et al, 2010;Kumar & Rosé, 2011). Introduction of such technology in a classroom setting has consistently led to significant improvements in student learning (Adamson et al, 2014), and even positive impacts on the classroom environment outside of the collaborative activities (Clarke et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we build on a paradigm for dynamic support for group learning that has proven effective for improving interaction and learning in a series of online group learning studies conducted in classroom settings. In particular we refer to using tutorial dialogue agent technology to provide interactive support within a synchronous collaborative chat environment (Kumar et al, 2007;Chaudhuri et al, 2008;Chaudhuri et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Ai et al, 2010;Kumar & Rosé, 2011). Introduction of such technology in a classroom setting has consistently led to significant improvements in student learning (Adamson et al, 2014), and even positive impacts on the classroom environment outside of the collaborative activities (Clarke et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheuer, de Laat, Hever, de Groot & Rosé, 2007;Mu, Stegman, Mayfield, Rosé, & Fischer, 2012). This work has enabled a whole series of studies where interactive support for collaborative learning is triggered by real time analysis of collaborative processes and yields significant positive impact on learning (Kumar, Rosé, Wang, Joshi, & Robinson, 2007;Chaudhuri et al, 2008;Ai, Kumar, Nguyen, Nagasunder, & Rosé, 2010;Kumar & Rosé, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been quite encouraging so far, indicating that the use of conversational agents for providing collaborative learning support can significantly enhance the learning outcomes (e.g. Chaudhuri et al 2008;Dyke et al 2012;Kumar et al 2007b).…”
Section: Conversational Agents In Csclmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, the use of tutorial dialogue agents that encourage peers to engage in directed lines of reasoning, also known as knowledge construction dialogues, have been reported to significantly improve learning outcomes (Chaudhuri et al 2008;Kumar et al 2007b). In addition, it was revealed that the unsolicited supportive prompts of an agent can be more effective than solicited supportive prompts (Chaudhuri et al 2009).…”
Section: Conversational Agents In Csclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation