2016
DOI: 10.1080/15299716.2016.1196157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It's not Pans, It's People”: Student and Teacher Perspectives on Bisexuality and Pansexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of our participants identified with multiple identity terms. As young people increasingly affiliate with alternative non-binary identities such as pansexual (Lapointe, 2017), these are rapidly becoming an important area for future researchers to specifically focus on when exploring identity and relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of our participants identified with multiple identity terms. As young people increasingly affiliate with alternative non-binary identities such as pansexual (Lapointe, 2017), these are rapidly becoming an important area for future researchers to specifically focus on when exploring identity and relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in recent years, the number of people identifying as bisexual or under the "bisexual umbrella" 5 (e.g. using identity labels describing attraction to more than one gender) is increasing (Lapointe, 2017). Therefore, bisexual invisibility cannot be ascribed to a lack of bisexual people (Yoshino, 2000).…”
Section: The Invisibility/invalidity Of Bisexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that there is little consensus on a singular definition of the term pansexual (or panromantic) (Belous & Bauman, 2017). This argument arises on the basis that pansexual (and panromantic) people may conceptualize and construct their identities in multiple and complex ways (Lapointe, 2017). In some instances, pansexual (and panromantic) have been conflated with bisexual (and biromantic) identities (Galupo et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Development Of Pansexual and Panromantic Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academics and activists (many of whom are bisexual) have argued that definitions of bisexuality should not be stripped down to meaning only two (see discussion with Robyn Ochs and Heron Greenesmith in Doyle, 2019;Hayfield, 2020). Contemporary definitions of bisexuality have evolved beyond the binary and bisexual communities have been inclusive of -and included -trans and non-binary people for many years (Dingle, 2016;Doyle, 2019;Flanders et al, 2017;Hayfield, 2020;Lapointe, 2017). Nonetheless, pansexuality has been perceived as more explicitly inclusive of a gender spectrum and therefore as more explicitly inclusive of trans and non-binary identities (Belous & Bauman, 2017;Dingle, 2017).…”
Section: Pansexual and Panromantic As Moving Beyond The Gender Binary: The Explicit Recognition And Inclusion Of Trans Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation