2013
DOI: 10.1108/01409171311325732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It's (not) the economy, stupid”: wasted opportunities (apologies to James Carville)

Abstract: PurposeTaking a broad review of the management and economics literature, the purpose of this paper is to examine how the recent “Great Recession” has had a disproportionate adverse impact on US labor markets and created social disruptions to professional workers experiencing persistent unemployment or underemployment.Design/methodology/approachSecondary data analysis shows how the recent recession has had a disproportionate impact on employment. Recognizing underemployment as a potentially persistent state, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment result show fairly good result, indicated by a score of 3.77 for engineering students, a score of 3.75 for information technology students, and a score of 3.70 for agriculture engineering students. Those result shows fairly good condition, where assessment result are in range of score 3 which represent "fair" evaluation and score 4 which represent "good" evaluation in 5 point Likert scale [1][2][3][4][5]. Result also shows that engineering student have relatively better technopreneur talent than information technology students and agriculture engineering students.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Assessment result show fairly good result, indicated by a score of 3.77 for engineering students, a score of 3.75 for information technology students, and a score of 3.70 for agriculture engineering students. Those result shows fairly good condition, where assessment result are in range of score 3 which represent "fair" evaluation and score 4 which represent "good" evaluation in 5 point Likert scale [1][2][3][4][5]. Result also shows that engineering student have relatively better technopreneur talent than information technology students and agriculture engineering students.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both testing result show that all indicators used in three assessment steps and no indicators discarded The result of Step 1 shows that students from the three faculties have fairly good technopreneur indicators score. All indicators assessment have had score greater than 3, which represent "fair" evaluation in 5 point Likert scale [1][2][3][4][5]. Confidence indicators even get score higher than 4 which represent "good" evaluation for agriculture engineering and engineering students.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations