2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It's not your peers, and it's not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
137
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 One set of papers uses proxy variables to break the link between unobserved and peer ability (Arcidiacono and Nicholson (2005), Hanushek, Kain, Markman, and Rivkin (2003), and Betts and Morell (1999)). Another set of papers relies on some form of random assignment (Sacerdote (2001), Zimmerman (2003), Winston and Zimmerman (2003), Foster (2006), Lehrer and Ding (2007), Carrell and Hoekstra (2010), Carrell, Fullerton, andWest (2009), Carrell, West, andMalmstrom (2008), and Hoxby (2001)). Finally, researchers have tried to circumvent the endogeneity problem with instrumental variables (Evans, Oates, and Schwab (1992)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 One set of papers uses proxy variables to break the link between unobserved and peer ability (Arcidiacono and Nicholson (2005), Hanushek, Kain, Markman, and Rivkin (2003), and Betts and Morell (1999)). Another set of papers relies on some form of random assignment (Sacerdote (2001), Zimmerman (2003), Winston and Zimmerman (2003), Foster (2006), Lehrer and Ding (2007), Carrell and Hoekstra (2010), Carrell, Fullerton, andWest (2009), Carrell, West, andMalmstrom (2008), and Hoxby (2001)). Finally, researchers have tried to circumvent the endogeneity problem with instrumental variables (Evans, Oates, and Schwab (1992)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to difficulties in measuring peer influence, there is a relatively small body of direct credible evidence of peer effects (see Sacerdote 2001;Zimmerman 2003;Stinebrickner and Stinebrickner 2006;Hoxby and Weingarth 2006). In fact, the most recently published research has drawn into question the very existence of peer effects in higher education (Foster 2006;Lyle 2007). Even less is known about the potential mechanisms that may drive peer influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, such quasi-experimental studies exploit the randomised trials generated by the chance matching of students with first-year roommates in college accommodation (see, among others, Sacerdote, 2001;Foster, 2006;Brunello, De Paola and Scoppa, 2010), changes in student distribution criteria (Hoxby and Weingrath, 2006) or class assignment on the basis of surname during first-year university courses . Albeit randomised trials based evidence appear to be the most convincing in terms of internal validity, these experiences are relatively scarce and some authors pointed out the lack of external validity of such estimates because of the peculiarity of the samples used (and the different realities they reflect).…”
Section: Selected Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%