2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“It's safer to …” parent consulting and clinician antibiotic prescribing decisions for children with respiratory tract infections: An analysis across four qualitative studies

Abstract: This paper reports a cross-study analysis of four studies, aiming to understand the drivers of parental consulting and clinician prescribing behaviour when children under 12 years consult primary care with acute respiratory tract infections (RTI). Qualitative data were obtained from three primary studies and one systematic review. Purposeful samples were obtained for (i) a focus group study of parents' information needs and help seeking; (ii) an interview study of parents' experiences of primary health care (6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
146
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
146
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary care clinicians acknowledge that they prescribe antibiotics for a range of medical and non-medical reasons, 10 particularly in children, who are seen as vulnerable 11 and whose clinical state can change rapidly. Many clinicians report that they prescribe antibiotics just in case, 12 to mitigate perceived risk of future hospital admission and complications,13, 14 and that failing to provide a prescription for a child who subsequently becomes seriously unwell is professionally unacceptable 11 . If primary care clinicians could identify children at low (or very low) risk of such future complications, the reduced clinical uncertainty could lead to a reduced use of antibiotics in these groups of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary care clinicians acknowledge that they prescribe antibiotics for a range of medical and non-medical reasons, 10 particularly in children, who are seen as vulnerable 11 and whose clinical state can change rapidly. Many clinicians report that they prescribe antibiotics just in case, 12 to mitigate perceived risk of future hospital admission and complications,13, 14 and that failing to provide a prescription for a child who subsequently becomes seriously unwell is professionally unacceptable 11 . If primary care clinicians could identify children at low (or very low) risk of such future complications, the reduced clinical uncertainty could lead to a reduced use of antibiotics in these groups of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies consider how risk gets translated into different contexts (see Arribas-Ayllon & Sarangi, 2014;Burton-Jeangros, Cavalli, Gouilhers, & Hammer, 2013), how practitioners intervene to minimise risks in practice (see Cabral, Lucas, Ingram, Hay, & Horwood, 2015;Cricco-Lizza, 2010), and/or how caring is carried out amid (or in spite of) contexts characterised in terms of risk (see Broom, Broom, & Kirby, 2014;Iversen, Broström, & Ulander, 2017). These three features of risk work-interpreting risk knowledge, intervening to minimize risk, and handling social relations and interactions-are illuminated in these studies alongside some connections between them (Gale et al, 2016).…”
Section: Existing Research On the Wider Context Of Risk And Organisatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 GPs tend towards prescribing antibiotics in the face of uncertainty for paediatric RTIs, due to a perception that not prescribing carries greater potential threat. 11 The Chief Medical Officer's 2011 Annual Report identifies a need for enhanced surveillance of infectious diseases, with a focus on tackling AMR and improving antibiotic stewardship, and recommends research to enhance infectious disease surveillance. 12 Currently available UK healthcare-based infection surveillance information includes microbiology data presented in weekly laboratory reports from the Public Health England (PHE) based on swabs predominantly received from secondary care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%