Metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) has advanced many opportunities to assess biodiversity. Surveys are based on the genetic identification of taxa and rely on the fact that animals leave DNA traces in their habitat (Taberlet et al., 2012). By sampling the substrate, the targeted taxa can be identified without harming the organisms, and often by minimizing habitat disturbances, which is especially desirable when addressing conservation questions (Barnes & Turner, 2016). Moreover, metabarcoding can support, complement, or even replace traditional sampling methods (Deiner et al., 2017), and is particularly useful for cryptic taxa or where sampling approaches exceed available resources (Biggs et al., 2015). However, although eDNA metabarcoding has been commonly applied in aquatic systems by sampling water, its application in terrestrial ecosystems is only evolving recently (but see Cristescu & Hebert, 2018).In forest ecosystems, dead wood harbors a large number of species, especially fungi, bacteria, and insects (Stokland et al., 2012).