“…Yet, as Michael Wesley succinctly observes, "the NPT represents a failing regime that is consuming diplomatic resources that could be more effectively used to build an alternative arms control regime." 42 Moreover, incorrectly assuming that the treaty and its associated instruments can prevent nuclear proliferation into the twenty-first century, when it has failed to do so since the end of the Cold War, squanders valuable intellectual time and effort that could be better spent thinking about how to integrate new nuclear powers such as India and Pakistan, and emerging nuclear powers such as North Korea, into the international nuclear community. In continuing to adhere to the anachronistic definition of a NWS as one that has tested a nuclear device prior to 1967, the NPT denies the legitimacy of new and emerging nuclear states and encourages an environment where these states are isolated from the international mainstream.…”