2022
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It’s Time We Looked Under the Hood: An In-Depth Examination of Five Public California Area Agencies on Aging

Abstract: Background and Objectives As the older adult population grows, it is important to understand the effectiveness of service delivery systems that support aging in place. Studying service delivery processes and organizational structures of Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) is essential for future efforts to understand service delivery outcomes and innovations. Research Design and Methods We conducted site visits with five government… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were systems or organizations in Japan and Michigan that have been established to serve this purpose, such as Japan’s community-based integrated care system [ 40 ] or Area Agency on Aging in Michigan [ 55 ]. However, the cooperation with those organizations and medical institutions are still in the developmental stages [ 56 , 57 ]. For caring community dwelling older adults with multimorbidity including dementia, the collaboration needs to be promoted with more access to relevant information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were systems or organizations in Japan and Michigan that have been established to serve this purpose, such as Japan’s community-based integrated care system [ 40 ] or Area Agency on Aging in Michigan [ 55 ]. However, the cooperation with those organizations and medical institutions are still in the developmental stages [ 56 , 57 ]. For caring community dwelling older adults with multimorbidity including dementia, the collaboration needs to be promoted with more access to relevant information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%