“It takes skills to take a car”: Perceptual and procedural expertise in carjacking

Topalli, Volkan; Jacques, Scott; Wright, Richard

doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.001

Cited by 39 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consider the significant technical knowledge and skill associated with computer hacking (Holt, Bossler, & Seigfried-Spellar, 2015); the competent interpersonal skill displayed in certain forms of identity theft (Vieraitis, Copes, Powell, & Pike, 2015); or the planning, grooming, and deception required to elude detection in the predatory child molester (Fortune, Bourke, & Ward, 2015;Ward, 1999). Such "expertise" has also been reported in social cue processing in street criminals (Topalli, 2005); the procedural scripts of arsonists (Butler & Gannon, 2015); the practiced coercion and control used in the planning and execution of murder (Brookman, 2015), domestic abuse (Day & Bowen, 2015), and rape Ó Ciardha, 2015; and finally the perceptual and procedural scripts of carjackers (Topalli, Jacques, & Wright, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments*

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we describe a quasi‐experiment in which experienced incarcerated burglars (n = 56), other offenders (n = 50), and nonoffenders (n = 55) undertook a mock burglary within a virtual neighborhood. We draw from the cognitive psychology literature on expertise and apply it to offending behavior, demonstrating synergy with rational choice perspectives, yet extending them in several respects. Our principal goal was to carry out the first robust test of expertise in offenders by having these groups undertake a burglary in a fully fledged reenactment of a crime in a virtual environment. Our findings indicate that the virtual environment successfully reinstated the context of the crime showing clear differences in the decision making of burglars compared with other groups in ways commensurate with expertise in other behavioral domains. Specifically, burglars scoped the neighborhood more thoroughly, spent more time in the high‐value areas of the crime scene while traveling less distance there, and targeted different goods from the comparison groups. The level of detail in the data generated sheds new light on the cognitive processes and actions of burglars and how they “learn on the job.” Implications for criminal decision‐making perspectives and psychological theories of expertise are discussed.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments*

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1. Automatic, unintentional, pre-conscious appraisal of the environment that cannot be turned For offenders, most evidence comes from empirical work associated with decision-making in burglars (see Nee, 2015 for a review) but superior knowledge of cues, script-like knowledge and ease/automaticity of behaviour have been cited frequently in interview studies in the emerging literature, for example, implicit planning in child sex offenders and identity thieves (Ward & Hudson, 2000;Vieraitis, Copes, Powell & Pike, 2015) and use of automatic scripts in sex offenders (Bourke, Ward & Rose, 2012;Fortune, Bourke & Ward, 2015), firesetters (Butler & Gannon, 2015), and carjackers (Topalli, Jacques & Wright, 2015).…”

Section: Functional and Dysfunctional Expertisementioning

confidence: 99%

Expertise and its contribution to the notion of protective factors in offender rehabilitation and desistance

Nee¹,

Vernham²

2017

Aggression and Violent Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the field of offender corrections, a preoccupation with risk prediction has come at the expense of explanation, and an overemphasis on risk factors has come at the expense of understanding protective factors. Some strides have been made in describing and categorising the types of factors that protect young people from a life of crime, or promote competencies and potentials that help them avoid it altogether. We argue, however, that like the field of dynamic risk factors, we know very little about the nature and function of these features, beyond describing them.The article describes theory and research associated with expertise and its qualities and value as both a risk and a protective factor in the prevention of crime. It draws from literature in forensic psychology, criminology, resilience and neuroscience.

show abstract

“…This approach helps to explain the offence process and the cognitive mechanisms that underlie the offence decision chain, e.g., the automatic and unconscious ability to attend to cues within the environment over time. Additionally, the approach has been used to help explain a variety of crimes including; burglary (Nee, 2015), drug-related offending (Casey, 2015), sexual offending (O'Ciardha, 2015), identity theft (Vieraitis, Copes, Powell & Pike, 2015), firesetting (Butler & Gannon, 2015), intimate partner violence (Day & Bowen, 2015), homicide (Brookman, 2015), and carjacking (Topalli, Jacques & Wright, 2015).…”

Section: Dysfunctional Expertise and Dynamic Risk Factors 12mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dysfunctional expertise and its relationship with dynamic risk factors in offenders

Vernham

Nee

2015

Psychology, Crime & Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predicting the risk an offender poses is vital for protecting the public and/or the offender themselves; thus reducing recidivism rates. Dynamic risk factors are useful for informing treatment programmes because of their changeability. However, the current conceptualisation of dynamic risk factors has recently been under scrutiny within the rehabilitation literature, because their categorical nature lacks description and cannot explain the underlying causal mechanisms of offending behaviours. Expertise is a new area within the rehabilitation literature that examines the decision-making processes involved across the offending episode (prior, during, and after a crime). It is one example of how looking more closely at the processes the offender employs across the offending episode might help to understand more clearly some of the mechanisms underlying dynamic risk factors. This article first discusses the literature and theoretical models that have been proposed with regard to risk prediction and offender expertise, before exploring the links between the two. Using a theoretical framework, which moves away from a deficit-based focus to one in which emphasis is placed on the offender's own personal agency, the authors describe how the competencies underpinning cognition can be used as a starting point for positive change. Implications for offender treatments are discussed.

show abstract

“It takes skills to take a car”: Perceptual and procedural expertise in carjacking

Cited by 39 publications

References 35 publications

Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments*

Learning on the job: Studying expertise in residential burglars using virtual environments*

Expertise and its contribution to the notion of protective factors in offender rehabilitation and desistance

Dysfunctional expertise and its relationship with dynamic risk factors in offenders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About