2022
DOI: 10.1177/09579265221088143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘It was Never Just About the Statue’: Ethos of historical figures in public debates on contested cultural objects

Abstract: Collective, historical memory becomes increasingly important in public debates on cultural heritage across many countries. Their key elements are contested cultural objects – such as statues or memorials – which construct nations’ memory that governs societal processes such as decolonisation or de-Stalinization. This paper analyses arguments about five such objects in UK, US, South Africa, Poland and Spain in order to identify discursive strategies used to argue whether to remove or to keep them. Large-scale c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since arguments of this type are clearly designed to influence the way in which the speaker is perceived, there are certainly links to be explored with character judgments (Walton 2006) and the recently invigorated field of study into ethotic arguments (Koszowy et al 2022;Pereira-Fariña et al 2022). This would require a full treatment of its own, not least because the need to differentiate character and identity, and the use of arguments to reduce the ethos of others, rather than to build our own identities, would add levels of great complexity.…”
Section: Identity and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since arguments of this type are clearly designed to influence the way in which the speaker is perceived, there are certainly links to be explored with character judgments (Walton 2006) and the recently invigorated field of study into ethotic arguments (Koszowy et al 2022;Pereira-Fariña et al 2022). This would require a full treatment of its own, not least because the need to differentiate character and identity, and the use of arguments to reduce the ethos of others, rather than to build our own identities, would add levels of great complexity.…”
Section: Identity and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%