2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian multicentre study for application of a diagnostic algorithm in autoantibody testing for autoimmune rheumatic disease: Conclusive results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, ANA detection has been confirmed as the first level test for the serology of SARD by an international expert panel [1]. As a matter of fact, classical ANA testing requires the characterization of positive ANA findings by immunoassays for the detection of specific autoAbs to nuclear and cytoplasmic autoantigenic targets in the framework of the recommended two-tier approach [30][31][32]. However, this diagnostic two-step process has proved to be laborious and created constraints in particular for larger laboratories with high throughput [16,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, ANA detection has been confirmed as the first level test for the serology of SARD by an international expert panel [1]. As a matter of fact, classical ANA testing requires the characterization of positive ANA findings by immunoassays for the detection of specific autoAbs to nuclear and cytoplasmic autoantigenic targets in the framework of the recommended two-tier approach [30][31][32]. However, this diagnostic two-step process has proved to be laborious and created constraints in particular for larger laboratories with high throughput [16,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, classical ANA testing requires the characterization of positive ANA findings by immunoassays for the detection of specific autoAbs to nuclear and cytoplasmic autoantigenic targets in the framework of the recommended two-tier approach [30][31][32]. However, this diagnostic two-step process has proved to be laborious and created constraints in particular for larger laboratories with high throughput [16,30]. Several attempts have been made to replace the two-tier testing by one analysis deploying different assay platforms [3,15,30,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Важной задачей стандартизации лабораторной диагностики РЗ является сопоставление и гармони-зация иммунологических тестов с международными и национальными референтными материалами (ат-тестованными стандартными образцами) и мето-дами исследований, базами данных о референтных пределах анализируемых биомаркеров, алгоритма-ми оценки полученных результатов (A) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: общие рекомендацииunclassified
“…Верхний предел референтного интервала (ВПРИ) антител к гистонам при тестировании сыво- 4. Рекомендуемая частота определения антител к гистонам составляет 1 раз в 6 мес -1 год [10,20].…”
Section: антитела к гистонамunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation