Italian water services reform from 1994 to 2008: decisional rounds and local modes of governance

Abstract

Italian water services reform, started in 1994, has been surrounded by a lively debate on water management models; however, the story of the reform is difficult to understand if only those models chosen by local public agencies are considered. This paper provides a general picture of the reform, analyzes the decision-making process and presents a map of local outcomes. The decision-making analysis considers the course of action taken by the actors involved in reform from 1994 to 2008, and summarizes the events into three rounds. The map of the local modes of governance is focused on the relationship between local authorities and utilities, and has been realized through a collection of data from the 91 areas in which the national system has been reorganized, which has allowed the definition of four ideal types of outcome. The analysis shows that the range of solutions is wider (and the boundaries between them more ambiguous) than commonly assumed by the mainstream national debate which appears to overestimate the role of tools and of formal instruments, and, conversely, to underestimate the real and differentiated abilities and power of the actors in the water sector.

Measuring the efficiency of water utilities: a cross-national comparison between Portugal and Italy

“…The Galli law also created a national committee for water resources (the Commissione Nazionale di Vigilanza sulle Risorse Idriche -COVIRI) to support the Ministry for the Environment in monitoring the application of the regulatory rules (Carrozza, 2011). COVIRI has responsibilities regarding the definition and fine-tuning of the water service tariffs and consumer protection.…”

“…Local governments try to retain control and discretion over the services but the pressures for removing the barriers to entry in the market are increasing. Moreover, the use of PPP arrangements is often seen by local decision-makers as the only feasible way to cope with the constraints on public debt (Carrozza, 2011).…”

Seed for change : the making and implementation of seed policies in Ethiopia

“…Alternatively, there could be domination by one actor, leading to the adoption of a policy option presented by that actor without agreement. As pointed out by Carrozza (2011), the rounds model helps to deal with unpredictable chains of events, where identifying the round at which a central decision is made is difficult due to the incremental nature of the process itself. Hence, there are unpredictable numbers of rounds of discussions in which some decisions are made in each round, which may or may not affect the next round.…”

Characterizing the recent decline of water consumption in Italian cities

“…(La Repubblica, 2017) In Italy the process of privatization of water services began in the mid-1990s through various legislative measures that recognized the inability of the Italian state to manage these services (based on 7,000 different agencies) efficiently. Despite the reform of water management systems approved by the Italian Parliament in 1994 (Carrozza, 2011), this fragmentation still hampers efficient management. However, other voices claim that reform was addressed to introduce private models of water governance following the EU interest in fostering competition in the provision of public services, and that local governments have struggled to prevent private management (Carrozza and Fantini, 2016).…”