2015
DOI: 10.5455/jcme.20151011041414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item analysis: An evaluation of multiple choice questions in Physiology examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The item difficulty of the verbal performance items ranged from very difficult (pi = 0.06) to moderate (pi = 0.61). In line with previous research suggesting that performance items need to be difficult to trigger stereotype threat effects (Keller, 2007), and research defining pi < 30 as difficult (e.g., Shete et al, 2015), we analyzed only the performance results on the more difficult verbal performance task. 1 In our verbal performance task ("analogies"), which was adapted from the I-S-T 2000 R test (Amthauer et al, 2001), participants had to identify the relationship between two given words and then apply that rule to choose a word out of five possible alternatives that shows a similar relationship (i.e., analogy) to another given word (Beauducel, Liepmann, Horn, & Brocke, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The item difficulty of the verbal performance items ranged from very difficult (pi = 0.06) to moderate (pi = 0.61). In line with previous research suggesting that performance items need to be difficult to trigger stereotype threat effects (Keller, 2007), and research defining pi < 30 as difficult (e.g., Shete et al, 2015), we analyzed only the performance results on the more difficult verbal performance task. 1 In our verbal performance task ("analogies"), which was adapted from the I-S-T 2000 R test (Amthauer et al, 2001), participants had to identify the relationship between two given words and then apply that rule to choose a word out of five possible alternatives that shows a similar relationship (i.e., analogy) to another given word (Beauducel, Liepmann, Horn, & Brocke, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The proportion of students answering an item correctly indicates the level of difficulty of the item, and it is affected by the examinees' knowledge, as well as the clarity and relevance of the question. Practically, it is essential to use items with positive discrimination level when implementing MCQ in medical licensing examination [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discrimination Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Carefully constructed MCQs help in assessing higher order thinking skills. [7][8][9] They also help in sampling broad domains of knowledge effectively and reliably. MCQs, therefore, can serve as an effective tool to assess student performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the quality of items, MCQ constructional skill of the examiner and poor items needing revision or deletion can also be recognised. 7 It can also serve as an effective feedback tool to improve the standard of teaching. The difficulty index and the discrimination index can be computed doing an item analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation