1971
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/26.4.470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item Concreteness and Reported Strategies in Paired-Associate Learning as a Function of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The older adults used less imagery but more sentence than young adults, whereas young adults chose both strategies to the same extent. Our results are in accordance with previous studies showing that older adults without specific strategy instruction, that is the case for middle pairs, seem to prefer to use sentence rather than imagery (Hertzog & Dunlosky, 2004;Hulicka & Grossman, 1967;Rowe & Schnore, 1971;Whitbourne & Slevin, 1978). However, when strategies are suggested by instruction, older adults remain capable of selecting effective strategies but to a lesser proportion than younger adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The older adults used less imagery but more sentence than young adults, whereas young adults chose both strategies to the same extent. Our results are in accordance with previous studies showing that older adults without specific strategy instruction, that is the case for middle pairs, seem to prefer to use sentence rather than imagery (Hertzog & Dunlosky, 2004;Hulicka & Grossman, 1967;Rowe & Schnore, 1971;Whitbourne & Slevin, 1978). However, when strategies are suggested by instruction, older adults remain capable of selecting effective strategies but to a lesser proportion than younger adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have suggested that imagegeneration ability declines with aging Dror & Kosslyn, 1994;Kemps & Newson, 2005) and that older adults produce more general images and report more irrelevant details about them (Palladino & De Beni, 2003). Moreover, older adults seem to prefer to use sentences rather than imagery when any strategy instruction is given (Hulicka & Grossman, 1967;Rowe & Schnore, 1971). Using strategy reports for each paired-associate word of their study, Dunlosky and Hertzog (1998) showed that older adults are able to comply with instructions to use imagery, and interestingly that both young and older adults reported using imagery for only 70% of items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, subjective organization may be considered as a (unconscious or conscious) strategy for recall performance. Taking into account a possible deficit in spontaneous strategy use of older persons for building associations (Naveh-Benjamin, Brav, & Levy, 2007;Rowe & Schnore, 1971), a decline in verbal learning might be due to a deficit in strategy use that is reflected in a deficit in subjective organization.…”
Section: Age-related and Individual Differences In Subjective Organizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies have reported conflicting findings. An increase in the concreteness effect has been demonstrated, (Rowe & Schnore, 1971;Witte & Freund, 1976) as has an attenuation of the effect (Rissenberg & Glanzer, 1987) but this may be attributed to reduced functionality in an underlying cognitive process, such as memory. Peters and Daum (2008) investigated verbal memory and concreteness effects in a cross-sectional study which included three different age groups (mean 21, 42 and 61 years) and demonstrated both preserved and attenuated effects.…”
Section: Concreteness Effects In Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from behavioural studies investigating concreteness and ageing have provided mixed results with some reporting increases in the effects of concreteness with ageing (Rowe & Schnore, 1971;Witte & Freund, 1976) while others have shown an attenuation of the effect (Rissenberg & Glanzer, 1987), possibly attributable to reduced cognitive function in underlying processes, such as memory. A cross-sectional study across three age groups (mean ages 21, 42 and 61 years) investigated concreteness effects and verbal memory (Peters & Daum, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%