2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item development for a questionnaire investigating patient self reported perception, satisfaction and outcomes of a single osteopathy in the cranial field (OCF) treatment

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In the current study the sample was small and it was not appropriate to perform any factor analysis on the data.…”
Section: Positive Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…12 In the current study the sample was small and it was not appropriate to perform any factor analysis on the data.…”
Section: Positive Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The two sub-scales of the PPM-O, 'Education and Information' and 'Cognition and Fatigue' have been shown to be internally consistent in previous work (17) and the results of the present study support this. Although the PPM-O was originally developed for an OCF patient population (16), further refinement of the measure was undertaken with patients seeking predominantly structural osteopathy approaches to care (17). The outcomes of the current study in New Zealand osteopathy patients suggest the PPM-O may be valid for use in a patient population seeking predominantly OCF treatment.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 19mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A number of studies have researched the validity of this involuntary rhythm's palpability (8,9), and potential clinical uses (10)(11)(12)(13). However, only a limited number of studies have investigated the patient experience of OCF (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations