1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00288.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Item Discrimination: When More Is Worse

Abstract: High item discrimination can be a symptom o f a special kind of measurement disturbance introduced by an item that gives persons o f high ability a special advantage over and above their higher abilities. This type o f disturbance, which can be interpreted as a form o f item “bias,” can be encouraged by methods that routinely interpret highly discriminating items as the “best” items on a test and may be compounded by procedures that weight items by their discrimination. The type of measurement disturbance desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
6

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher values than expected indicate that the data are more random than predicted, whereas lower values indicate overfit, where the item, person, or rater is providing less information than expected. Overfit can be from any of a number of sources (Wright 1991) including multidimensionality (Masters 1988) and differential usage of the rating scale (Bowles 1999). The standardized fit statistics have associated statistical tests for significant misfit, based on a z-test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher values than expected indicate that the data are more random than predicted, whereas lower values indicate overfit, where the item, person, or rater is providing less information than expected. Overfit can be from any of a number of sources (Wright 1991) including multidimensionality (Masters 1988) and differential usage of the rating scale (Bowles 1999). The standardized fit statistics have associated statistical tests for significant misfit, based on a z-test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially an issue for the discrimination parameters, the standard errors of the latent trait estimate and related test reliability (see e.g., Sireci, Thissen, & Wainer, 1991;Chen & Thissen, 1997;Masters, 1988;Yen, 1984).…”
Section: Lid and Information Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para garantir a precisão do teste, é desejável que a discriminação seja alta, para que o item seja mais informativo em certa porção da escala, embora haja evidências de que uma discriminação muito alta possa produzir distorções (MASTERS, 1988). A dificuldade do item, por sua vez, não deve ser muito alta ou muito baixa, caso contrário o item apresenta pouca informação sobre a população analisada.…”
Section: Discriminação E Dificuldadeunclassified