Item generation and content validation of domains with item pool for the individual with knee osteoarthritis: a mixed-method study

Samuel, Asir John; Kanimozhi, D

doi:10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i1.3304

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The research team recruited a panel of 15 experts by purposive sampling methods ( Friedman, 2010 ; Palinkas et al, 2015 ; Samuel and Kanimozhi, 2021 ). Experts with a bachelor’s degree or above, who worked for more than 3 years in related fields (nursing, psychology, and rehabilitation), who had an intermediate title or higher, and who volunteered to participate were included in the study.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess symptoms of post-stroke depression in stroke patients at the rehabilitation stage

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe high incidence of post-stroke depression (PSD) during rehabilitation exerts a negative effect on the treatment and functional recovery of patients with stroke and increases the risk of mortality. It is necessary to screen PSD in the rehabilitation stage and thus provide effective intervention strategies. However, existing measurements used to assess PSD in the rehabilitation stage in patients with stroke lack specificity. This study aimed to develop a clinical measure to assess symptoms of PSD in the rehabilitation stage.MethodsThe research team created the initial items through a literature review and semi-structured interviews of patients with stroke. Then, the symptom-related items were estimated by three panels: healthcare professionals (N = 41), Delphi experts (N = 15), and patients with stroke in the rehabilitation stage (N = 30).ResultsThe literature review and semi-structured interview produced 51 symptom-related items including six domains, and the items were reduced to 47 by the healthcare professionals. The symptom-related items were further reduced to 33 items by a two-round Delphi consultation. The initiative coefficients of the two Delphi rounds were 71.4 and 100%, the expert authority coefficients were both 0.85, Kendall’s W were 0.152 and 0.408 (p < 0.01), and the coefficient of variation (CV) were 0.05–0.32 and 0.00–0.18, respectively. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) was 0.53–1.00, the scale-level CVI/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) was 0.26, and the S-CVI/average (S -CVI/Ave) was 0.85 for the first found Delphi consultation; the I-CVI was 0.67–1.00, the S-CVI/UA was 0.61, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.97 for the second round Delphi consultation. All content validity indicators have been significantly improved compared with the first round. Using mean ≥ 4 and full score ≥ 0.5, combined with CV ≤ 0.16 as the item criteria, a clinical measure of PSD with 33 items and 6 dimensions (cognition, sleep, behavior, emotion, body, and guilt) was finally formed after two rounds. The patients with stroke made no further revisions after evaluation.ConclusionThe research team developed a specific tool with good content validity to assess the symptoms of PSD in the rehabilitation stage.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess symptoms of post-stroke depression in stroke patients at the rehabilitation stage

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[15] Furthermore, the Delphi method was deemed superior to panel discussion because, in panel discussion, a dominant expert may influence the opinions of other experts. [16] The development of scoring guidelines for this questionnaire was a crucial component of this investigation. Initially, a straightforward three-point scale was employed in the primary draught, and the activity score was divided into three categories: Full, partial, and none.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[ 15 ] Furthermore, the Delphi method was deemed superior to panel discussion because, in panel discussion, a dominant expert may influence the opinions of other experts. [ 16 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and content validation of an ADL questionnaire for hemiplegic shoulder

Chatterjee

Goyal

2023

JNRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Shoulder problems can be a common secondary musculoskeletal complication after stroke. Common post-stroke shoulder problems include altered muscle tone, pain, and a frozen shoulder. The study was aimed at formulating an activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire for stroke patients with shoulder problems. Materials and Methods: The study was a cross-sectional content validation study conducted in a tertiary care hospital from August 2020 to March 2021. A literature review and direct patient interview were used to identify items for the scale. Before the construction of the scale, two physiotherapists with relevant field experience were interviewed to identify the items. Then, ten stroke patients were interviewed to generate new items depending on the challenges that they experienced. The scale was subsequently sent to a panel of eight experts for content evaluation. Results: After the first round of Delphi, we excluded the items that failed to achieve at least a 0.8 item-level content validity index (I-CVI). In the first round, 9 items fail to achieve 0.8 I-CVI hence removed from the actual draft of the scale. Total 10 items were included in the second draft and it was sent to the 2nd round of Delphi survey. In this phase, all items got more than 0.8 I-CVI. The average value and universal acceptance of the scale level content validity index have been obtained at 0.96 and 0.8, respectively. It denotes that our proposed questioner got excellent level of content validity. Conclusion: As the ADL questioner got excellent content validity, this scale can be used to assess the ADL functions of hemiplegic shoulder.

show abstract

Item generation and content validation of domains with item pool for the individual with knee osteoarthritis: a mixed-method study

Cited by 2 publications

References 25 publications

Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess symptoms of post-stroke depression in stroke patients at the rehabilitation stage

Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess symptoms of post-stroke depression in stroke patients at the rehabilitation stage

Development and content validation of an ADL questionnaire for hemiplegic shoulder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About