This paper investigates the applicability of common valuation techniques in finance when the decision‐maker's preferences can be described by the rank‐dependent expected utility model. Under expected utility theory, compound lotteries can be valued by “iterating” expectations: the expected utility of a compound lottery is the expected value of a simple lottery over prizes that are certainty equivalents to follow‐up lotteries. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a similar valuation technique in the framework of rank‐dependent expected utility when a consequentialist decision‐maker has to choose between prospects that belong to a comonotonic class. The conditions coincide with those for dynamically consistent behaviour of such a decision‐maker. The decision‐maker must update her preferences based on a benchmark prospect that can be interpreted as a formalization of “black‐and‐white thinking.”