2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterated privation and positive predication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of iterated privation has been dealt with by Jespersen & Carrara whom later the author of this paper joined. For the results see [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issue of iterated privation has been dealt with by Jespersen & Carrara whom later the author of this paper joined. For the results see [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of four genuine banknotes and one forged banknote is four banknotes and not five (though five pieces of paper). 7 This is also to say that Genuine is an idle modifier: anything is a genuine F iff it is an F. This is not to say that the same material object may not be genuine in one respect and fail to be genuine in another. For instance, an artefact being passed off as a paper banknote may fail to be a banknote (being a forged banknote), while being indeed made of paper (rather than polymer, say), thereby being a paper artefact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of iterated privation, privative modifiers are replaced by the general privative modifier Non. See (Jespersen et al 2017).…”
Section: Limiting Cases Of Modal Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horn, Wansing (2017, §1.4) Yet a similar phenomenon arises also in the case of privative modifiers of properties. The problem of privation of properties has been dealt with by Jespersen, Carrara and Duží (2017) where the authors show that modifiers privative with respect to a property P turn the root property P to the property [M P] that is contrary rather than contradictory with respect to P. To this end they apply the method of intensional essentialism, which operates on properties (intensions) rather than their extensions. The authors argue that each property P is necessarily associated with an essence, which is the set of the so-called requisites of P that jointly define P. Privation deprives P of some but not all of its requisites, replacing them by their contradictories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%