“…In total, 79 papers were presented in the table. The problem characteristics are observed in the following order: vehicle load (cargo) capacity (48), linear charging/refueling function at station (34), customer time windows (34), partial recharging strategy (30), fixed refueling/recharging time (19), different charging technologies at CSs (17), heterogeneous (mixed) fleet (16), energy consumption model (15), BSS (9), nonlinear charging function (8), dynamic traffic conditions (8), location routing (7), capacitated stations (6), and HEVs (5). We can point out that only a few papers are dealing with (i) simultaneous CS siting and BEV routing (E-LRP) where great savings can be achieved in companies whose business plans include CS investments, as E-LRP generally gives better routing configuration than the E-VRP [73,88]; (ii) nonlinear charging function, negligence of which can lead to infeasible solutions and additional penalty costs [68,72]; (iii) HEVs (PHEVs) that have an advantage in several routing scenarios but are being researched only recently due to the higher complexity of the problem as HEVs can change their propulsion mode at any time during the route [96]; (iv) dynamic traffic conditions, which significantly influence BEVs' energy consumption [74]; (v) different charging technologies at CSs, which could reduce the overall costs by selecting the best possible charger option in each occasion [46,79]; (vi) CS related challenges: capacitated CS [68,75,80], CS reservations [44], and publicprivate recharge strategy [81]; and (vii) robust E-VRP variant…”