2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1705.07229
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iteration-complexity of a Jacobi-type non-Euclidean ADMM for multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs

Jefferson G. Melo,
Renato D. C. Monteiro

Abstract: This paper establishes the iteration-complexity of a Jacobi-type non-Euclidean proximal alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for solving multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs. The subproblems of this ADMM variant can be solved in parallel and hence the method has great potential to solve large scale multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs. Moreover, our analysis allows the Lagrange multiplier to be updated with a relaxation parameter in the interval (0, 2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, researchers have extended the ADMM framework to solve nonconvex multi-block problem (1.1), where [16,25,28,33,42,47,46,66,67,68]. The asymptotical convergence and an iteration complexity of O(ǫ −2 ) are established based on two crucial assumptions on the problem data: (a) g p = 0 and (b) the column space of A p contains the column space of the concatenated matrix…”
Section: Nonconvex Constraints Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, researchers have extended the ADMM framework to solve nonconvex multi-block problem (1.1), where [16,25,28,33,42,47,46,66,67,68]. The asymptotical convergence and an iteration complexity of O(ǫ −2 ) are established based on two crucial assumptions on the problem data: (a) g p = 0 and (b) the column space of A p contains the column space of the concatenated matrix…”
Section: Nonconvex Constraints Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to being able to handle nonlinear constraints, SDD-ADMM (p > 1) achieves better iteration complexities under a more general setting. Compared to existing multi-block nonconvex ADMM works [16,25,33,42,47,46,66,67,68], we do not impose restrictive assumptions on problem data (see Section 2.2), and we show that SDD-ADMM obtains an ǫ-stationary solution in O(ǫ −4 ) iterations, which can be further improved to O(ǫ −3 ) under an additional technical assumption. Our results improve the O(ǫ −6 ) and O(ǫ −4 ) iteration complexities established in [28], and match the upper bounds in [63], where a more structured two-block problem is considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) belongs to the latter class of methods and has seen a recent surge in popularity because of its suitability for distributed computation; e.g., see [8]. However, the vast majority of provably convergent ADMM approaches for solving (1) either exploit convexity in the objective function f t or constraints X t or they are tailored for specific instances of (1); e.g., see [9]- [14].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We supplement the analysis by showing (empirically) that convergence fails if the proximal weights in the algorithm are not chosen appropriately. The algorithm can be interpreted as a nonconvex constrained extension of the Jacobi algorithms proposed in [14], [27], [29], [30], and as a Jacobi extension of the Gauss-Seidel algorithm for nonconvex problems proposed in [18]. In contrast to the majority of existing approaches for nonconvex problems, we provide a practical and automatic parameter tuning scheme, an open-source Julia implementation (that can be downloaded from https://github.com/exanauts/ProxAL.jl), and an empirical demonstration of convergence on a largescale multi-period optimal power flow test case.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation