1985
DOI: 10.1080/02726348508908144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Approaches to the Solution of Electromagnetic Boundary Value Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of this direction vector is considered in the next section. [20]. The comparison of the performances of the methods that result from these choices when applied to some canonical 3-D homogeneous problems is given in Section 4.…”
Section: Van Den Berg's Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The generation of this direction vector is considered in the next section. [20]. The comparison of the performances of the methods that result from these choices when applied to some canonical 3-D homogeneous problems is given in Section 4.…”
Section: Van Den Berg's Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let KA denotes the adjoint of the kernel K; then the VBF which gives rise to the Conjugate Gradient method can be written as [14,20] The most desirable property of the CGM, either presented in its original form [15], or as a member of van den Berg's algorithm [14] lies in the orthogonal relationship between the basis functions at different steps. This relationship, which is expressed in inner product notation as is the key to the convergence guarantee when the CGM is applied to any problems, irrespective of the starting condition.…”
Section: Conjugatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, numerical difficulties are also encountered in this scheme, as it suffers from machine round-off errors causing loss of orthogonality and linear independence [19], so the global error can decrease very slowly, resulting in a large number of iterations. Moreover, an erroneous behavior is observed in the current density even when using expansion functions for improving the rate of convergence [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%