Iterative Bayesian Estimation of Travel Times on Urban Arterials: Fusing Loop Detector and Probe Vehicle Data

Abstract

On urban arterials, travel time estimation is challenging especially from various data sources. Typically, fusing loop detector data and probe vehicle data to estimate travel time is a troublesome issue while considering the data issue of uncertain, imprecise and even conflicting. In this paper, we propose an improved data fusing methodology for link travel time estimation. Link travel times are simultaneously pre-estimated using loop detector data and probe vehicle data, based on which Bayesian fusion is then applied to fuse the estimated travel times. Next, Iterative Bayesian estimation is proposed to improve Bayesian fusion by incorporating two strategies: 1) substitution strategy which replaces the lower accurate travel time estimation from one sensor with the current fused travel time; and 2) specially-designed conditions for convergence which restrict the estimated travel time in a reasonable range. The estimation results show that, the proposed method outperforms probe vehicle data based method, loop detector based method and single Bayesian fusion, and the mean absolute percentage error is reduced to 4.8%. Additionally, iterative Bayesian estimation performs better for lighter traffic flows when the variability of travel time is practically higher than other periods.

Evaluating the sustainable traffic flow operational features of an exclusive spur dike U-turn lane design

“…The VISSIM parameters need to be calibrated and validated with the investigation data to ensure that the simulation is accurate [54, 55]. Traffic data, capacity and geometric measures were collected during the investigation to calibrate the simulation model in VISSIM [56]. In this study, the collected data contained valley and peak hour data; thus, both situations need to be calibrated.…”

Vehicle Identification by Means of Radio-Frequency-Identification Cards and Magnetic Loops

“…They are a widely extended and well-known reliable technology that offers good performance at low cost. Proof of this is that despite being introduced in the 1960's, magnetic loops are still the main elements of the newest algorithms for traffic management in cities [9]- [11].…”

Vehicle modeling for the analysis of the response of detectors based on inductive loops

“…However, although road infrastructure has changed significantly in recent years due to the continuous evolution of the technology, the truth is that magnetic loops continue to be the standard traffic sensor [3–8]. Currently, loop detectors still dominate traffic installations and are even part of the newest algorithms for traffic management in cities [9–11]. Moreover, these detectors have proven to be very cost effective and truly complete sensors since aside from their main application of vehicle classification, which includes buses, trucks, cars, motorcycles and even bicycles [12–17], magnetic loops are also used for vehicle speed measurements [18–24], wheel detection [25,26], bidirectional communication between vehicles and infrastructures [27] and vehicle re-identification [28].…”