2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative beam search algorithms for the permutation flowshop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We implemented a single-shot version of the iterative widening beam search approach by Libralesso et al (2021) for the flowtime variant of the PFSP within our framework. The achieved results over the famous Taillard benchmark (Taillard 1993) are shown to be competitive (Libralesso et al 2021) with their introduced guidance which combines a layer-dependent weighted sum of the machines' idle times and the costs-so-far.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We implemented a single-shot version of the iterative widening beam search approach by Libralesso et al (2021) for the flowtime variant of the PFSP within our framework. The achieved results over the famous Taillard benchmark (Taillard 1993) are shown to be competitive (Libralesso et al 2021) with their introduced guidance which combines a layer-dependent weighted sum of the machines' idle times and the costs-so-far.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beam search has been used to construct high-quality feasible solutions in the context of branch-and-bound, standalone, or combined in a hybrid setting with an improvement heuristic like local search. Quite recently, strong results have been obtained on difficult scheduling problems, see, e.g., Libralesso et al (2021) on Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling (PFSP) and Frohner, Neumann, and Raidl (2020) on the Traveling Tournament Problem (TTP). The most crucial parts are always the evaluation of the nodes, the guidance, and the beam width, limiting the maximum width of the search tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of this approach is biased by arranging jobs the first-row of the matrix according to the starting solution. Moreover, for each visited subproblem of a predefined depth, the beam-search algorithm recently proposed by (Libralesso et al 2020) is applied on partial solutions, leaving prefix and postfix partial schedules unchanged.…”
Section: Heuristic Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large number of open instances in the VRF benchmark (271/480), no attempts are made to solve instances with m = 60 machines and the allocated computational budget per instance is smaller than for the Taillard benchmark. Overall, 55 instances are solved exactly for the first time and 122 best-known solutions (Vallada et al 2015, Libralesso et al 2020, Kizilay et al 2019, Gmys et al 2020) are improved. The largest exactly solved instance is VRF30 20 1 (53.4 × 10 12 decomposed nodes, 200 GPUh)-the previously best-known solution is optimal.…”
Section: Vrf Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TSP is a problem with numerous relevant applications, and as a result, several studies have been carried out to solve it [42][43][44][45]. The SOP, like the TSP, also has several important studies, including energy optimization in compilers [46], search optimization [39,47] and parallel machine scaling [48]. Moreover, the TSP and SOP are NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems; that is, in practice, it is necessary to adopt approximate algorithms in the search for better solutions [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%