Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-28084-7_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Majorization Approach to the Distance-based Discriminant Analysis

Abstract: This paper proposes a method of finding a discriminative linear transformation that enhances the data's degree of conformance to the compactness hypothesis and its inverse. The problem formulation relies on inter-observation distances only, which is shown to improve non-parametric and non-linear classifier performance on benchmark and real-world data sets. The proposed approach is suitable for both binary and multiple-category classification problems, and can be applied as a dimensionality reduction technique.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…boat, sailboat, ferryboat, rowboat, at the expense of precision. Using the DDA baseline classifiers [8,9] for each concept C i ∈ H, the following precision and recall results on the test set vocabulary were obtained (see Figure 3). As seen from the figure, the naturally high recall results boosted by keyword group retrieval, Figure 3(a) do not necessarily correspond to high frequency common concepts emphasizing the importance of the concept co-occurrence factors, while the significantly lower precision values for complex concepts, such as church, fence, boat, Figure 3(b), indicate that these words are much more often retrieved as a group of semanticallyrelated keywords, rather than individually.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…boat, sailboat, ferryboat, rowboat, at the expense of precision. Using the DDA baseline classifiers [8,9] for each concept C i ∈ H, the following precision and recall results on the test set vocabulary were obtained (see Figure 3). As seen from the figure, the naturally high recall results boosted by keyword group retrieval, Figure 3(a) do not necessarily correspond to high frequency common concepts emphasizing the importance of the concept co-occurrence factors, while the significantly lower precision values for complex concepts, such as church, fence, boat, Figure 3(b), indicate that these words are much more often retrieved as a group of semanticallyrelated keywords, rather than individually.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In additional to its computational advantages, the majorization method has the valuable properties of low dependence on the initial value [32] and enhanced robustness with respect to local minima problems [20]. In the next section, we will outline a way to derive majorizing expressions of (2) and show how they can be used for optimizing the chosen criterion.…”
Section: General Overview Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%