2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative solutions of mildly nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the unprecedented resolution capabilities shown in various test cases, we are convinced that the method presented in this paper belongs to a new generation of shock capturing schemes for computational fluid dynamics. Future work may concern the extension of the present space-time adaptive algorithm to high order semi-implicit DG schemes, following the ideas outlined in [42,112,111,[20][21][22]24,25,45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the unprecedented resolution capabilities shown in various test cases, we are convinced that the method presented in this paper belongs to a new generation of shock capturing schemes for computational fluid dynamics. Future work may concern the extension of the present space-time adaptive algorithm to high order semi-implicit DG schemes, following the ideas outlined in [42,112,111,[20][21][22]24,25,45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system for the pressure (49) is again a mildly nonlinear system of the form (23) with a linear part that is symmetric and at least positive semidefinite. 39,40 Note that in the incompressible limit M → 0, following the asymptotic analysis performed in other works, 100-104 the pressure tends to a constant and the contribution of the kinetic energy k can be neglected w.r.t. 39,40 Note that in the incompressible limit M → 0, following the asymptotic analysis performed in other works, 100-104 the pressure tends to a constant and the contribution of the kinetic energy k can be neglected w.r.t.…”
Section: Pressure Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the application of semi-implicit methods to compressible flows with shock waves is still quite rare, and some recent developments in this direction have been made only very recently in other works, [26][27][28][29][30][31] where new conservative pressure-based semi-implicit schemes have been proposed that are also suitable for the simulation of flow problems including shock waves. The properties of the pressure system allow the use of the Newton-type techniques of Casulli et al, [37][38][39][40] for which convergence has been rigorously proven. The existing semi-implicit schemes for MHD either apply only to the incompressible or anelastic case, or they are not based on a conservative formulation, see, eg, other works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n and that A satisfies either one of the following properties: A1: A is a Stieltjes matrix, i.e., a symmetric M-matrix (for more details on M-matrix, we refer to [12,19,20] PLS (1.1) arises from the discretization of the free-surface hydrodynamic problem and a suitable, implicit discretization of this problem yields a piecewise linear system of the form (1.1) with A satisfying A1 or A2 at each time step (see, e.g., [2,3,5,6], for more details). Therefore, it is meaningful to develop efficient algorithms to solve PLS (1.1) and it has attracted much attention (see, e.g., [2][3][4]6,7,9,17,18]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%