2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.014410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition and large magnetovolume effects inLa(FexSi1x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
190
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition in La -Fe -Si (and Co-doped) compounds is accompanied by a sizeable volume change of about 1 % (ref. 19). Th ere is no change in the crystal symmetry, but the sample isotropically expands as it transforms from the high-temperature paramagnetic to the lowtemperature ferromagnetic phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition in La -Fe -Si (and Co-doped) compounds is accompanied by a sizeable volume change of about 1 % (ref. 19). Th ere is no change in the crystal symmetry, but the sample isotropically expands as it transforms from the high-temperature paramagnetic to the lowtemperature ferromagnetic phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would correspond to a 14% decrease of the volume in the PM phase compared to the FM phase whereas the experimentally determined decrease is about 1 to 2%. 5,13,20 In the following we will show that an atomic jump process model 23,24 with different activation energies ∆G 1 and ∆G 2 , as shown in Fig. 2 (c), would be a reasonable origin of the driving force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An itinerant electron metamagnetic transition can be induced by a magnetic field above T C but below a metamagnetic transition temperature T M . [3][4][5][6] By increasing the silicon content T C increases while T M decreases and the transition becomes less first order until the metamagnetic transition line merges with the magnetic transition line at x ≈ 1.8. 5 For x > 1.8 the magnetic transition is second order with a much smaller MCE and no metamagnetic transition can be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IEM transition mentioned above is explained in terms of the negative mode-mode coupling of spin fluctuations 10,11) In itinerant-electron metamagnets, the spin fluctuations in the paramagnetic state are strongly enhanced by the exchange interaction, whereas those in the ferromagnetic state are suppressed due to the onset of local magnetic moments. For Fig.…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%