2018
DOI: 10.1177/1750698018800749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Itinerant nationalisms and fracturing narratives: Incorporating regional dimensions of memory into peacebuilding

Abstract: Document VersionPeer reviewed version Link to publication Purdekova, A., 2018. Itinerant nationalisms and fracturing narratives: Incorporating regional dimensions of memory into peacebuilding, Memory Studies Abstract. Whilst conflict is often understood across multiple levels, including its regional dimension, peace-building and memory work are rarely put in conversation at this level. The paper explores regional dimensions of memory and argues that these open a novel and analytically productive lens on the na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historical memory is heterogeneous and presents itself in several dimensions: in the form of personal (family) historical memory, which is spontaneously formed by the social environment, in the form of a common historical memory, which is constructed and supported by the state (Polozhentseva & Kashchenko, 2014;Shnirelman, 2016) and in the form of regional historical memory, which is formed within the boundaries of the locus of residence. But if the narratives of different dimensions of historical memory do not agree with each other, then there may be a "torn memory effect", causing the loss of interest in the past, the emergence of a negative attitude to history, the birth of conflicts of personality, region and state (Barclay & Koefoed, 2021;Mazur, 2019;Purdeková, 2020). Such desynchronization poses threats to the existence of a positive civic identity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical memory is heterogeneous and presents itself in several dimensions: in the form of personal (family) historical memory, which is spontaneously formed by the social environment, in the form of a common historical memory, which is constructed and supported by the state (Polozhentseva & Kashchenko, 2014;Shnirelman, 2016) and in the form of regional historical memory, which is formed within the boundaries of the locus of residence. But if the narratives of different dimensions of historical memory do not agree with each other, then there may be a "torn memory effect", causing the loss of interest in the past, the emergence of a negative attitude to history, the birth of conflicts of personality, region and state (Barclay & Koefoed, 2021;Mazur, 2019;Purdeková, 2020). Such desynchronization poses threats to the existence of a positive civic identity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of changes taking place in the world community, the interest in border territories has significantly increased [1]. In modern conditions of integration and globalization, regions actively use their advantages to stimulate the processes of economic development [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of broader debates on memory politics in the wake of and amidst war and conflict, the dominant preoccupation is still with ‘present pasts’ (Huyssen, 2003) or what Werbner (1998) calls ‘post-wars of the dead’ – the ways in which violence is brought into a post-conflict present. Available scholarship analyses how memories of violent past shape local and national politics, foreign policies, how they are incorporated into political production and how they might inform renewed violence or peace-building (see Purdekova and Mwambari, 2022; Purdekova, 2020, 2015). There is work looking at specific sites of violence and memorials and how they are used for these purposes (Subotić, 2019a; Volkan, 2001).…”
Section: Linking Memory and Security In The War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%