2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ITZ microstructure of concrete containing GGBS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For watercementitious material ratio (w/c) = 0.5 and aggregate/ cementitious material ratio (a/c) = 3, the slump was increased by 20, 35 and 55 % for 10, 30 and 50 % GGBS replacement, respectively. Similar improvement was reported elsewhere (Gao et al 2005) for the partial replacement of PC with GGBS. Figure 3 shows the compressive strength development for the control mix and the mixes with 10, 30 and 50 % GGBS replacement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For watercementitious material ratio (w/c) = 0.5 and aggregate/ cementitious material ratio (a/c) = 3, the slump was increased by 20, 35 and 55 % for 10, 30 and 50 % GGBS replacement, respectively. Similar improvement was reported elsewhere (Gao et al 2005) for the partial replacement of PC with GGBS. Figure 3 shows the compressive strength development for the control mix and the mixes with 10, 30 and 50 % GGBS replacement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In general, it can be assumed that the higher the amount of water suction exerted by the pores of a particular sample, the more susceptible it would be to degradation and hence the less durable it would be deemed. As it can be seen from figure 3, the 100% PC specimens showed the greatest increase (Gao et al 2005). This trend was not observed in the measurement of water absorption (on the contrary, the amount of water absorbed by the GGBS samples was lower than that absorbed by the PC samples), since water absorption is more dependent on total volume of pores rather than on the pore size distribution.…”
Section: Capillary Testmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…GGBS and PFA vary from Ordinary Portland Cements, OPCs, in chemical composition, and potentially size range of particles; depending upon the processing these material experience during manufacture. The notable compositional differences being the quantities of calcium oxides, aluminium oxides and silica oxides oxides, (generally GGBS and PFA have increased levels of aluminium and silicon oxides and reduced quantities of calcium oxides when compared to OPC: Hill and Sharpe 2002;Escalante-Garcia and Sharpe 2004;Gao et al 2005) resulting in changes in the Si/Ca ratio and thus impacting upon the products formed during curing (Hill and Sharpe 2002;Escalante-Garcia and Sharpe 2004;Gao et al 2005). GGBS is considered a latent hydraulic binder (Hill and Sharpe 2002); the GGBS particles would experience curing reactions at both the outer surface and within the particles (also observed by Escalante-Garcia and Sharpe 2004).…”
Section: Curing Of the Cementitious Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%