1944
DOI: 10.1177/000348944405300105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IV Terminal Stages in the Development of the Human Stapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1948
1948
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This arrangement, which I observed in this specific study on the development of the stapedius muscle, offers a new vision and clarifies the development and formation of the stapedius muscle. It contradicts the classical conception in which this structure was thought to derive completely from the hyostapedial connection Anson et al 1944;Anson & Bast, 1946) or the interhyale one (Hanson et al 1962). Also, this new evidence contradicts those authors that theorized without making embryonic studies, believing that it derived from the remains of a second visceral bar (Hough, 1958;Grant & Grant, 1991;Patel, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This arrangement, which I observed in this specific study on the development of the stapedius muscle, offers a new vision and clarifies the development and formation of the stapedius muscle. It contradicts the classical conception in which this structure was thought to derive completely from the hyostapedial connection Anson et al 1944;Anson & Bast, 1946) or the interhyale one (Hanson et al 1962). Also, this new evidence contradicts those authors that theorized without making embryonic studies, believing that it derived from the remains of a second visceral bar (Hough, 1958;Grant & Grant, 1991;Patel, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, I disagree with Anson & Bast (1946), in that the stapes had a direct cartilaginous continuity with Reichert’s cartilage and that when this continuity was lost, it would remain joined by the hyostapedial connection. Also, I disagree with the authors (Anson & Cauldwell 1942; Anson et al. 1944; Anson & Bast 1946) who contended that the stapedius muscle would be formed from the hyostapedial connection and with those (Hanson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations