2014
DOI: 10.4103/2348-2907.127087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IVF Lite - A new strategy for managing poor ovarian responders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, vitrification of mature oocytes and embryos obtained better clinical outcomes and did not increase the risks of DNA damage, spindle configuration, embryonic aneuploidy, and genomic imprinting as compared to fresh and slow-freezing procedures, respectively [18]. This is the global trend now, and especially for older women, poor responders and now even for hyper-responders, a deferred or remote ET is preferred [3,4,11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, vitrification of mature oocytes and embryos obtained better clinical outcomes and did not increase the risks of DNA damage, spindle configuration, embryonic aneuploidy, and genomic imprinting as compared to fresh and slow-freezing procedures, respectively [18]. This is the global trend now, and especially for older women, poor responders and now even for hyper-responders, a deferred or remote ET is preferred [3,4,11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Till a few years ago, apart from oocyte donation, there was no known intervention to improve the pregnancy outcome of older patients. Today, with the widespread use of the IVF Lite protocol [2][3][4] and the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to screen embryos [5,6], we have pregnancy rates that have almost doubled in older women from a decade back.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural cycle [18], modified natural cycle [19], and IVF Lite [20] are different protocols, which provide some advantages compared to conventional stimulation: lower medication cost, less injections, less invasive, low risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, and multiple pregnancy [18][19][20]. Their main drawback is high cancelation rate due to premature ovulation and lack of egg recovery at the retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their main drawback is high cancelation rate due to premature ovulation and lack of egg recovery at the retrieval. When an embryo transfer can be performed, the cumulative pregnancy rate is similar to the results in conventional stimulation [18][19][20]. These protocols do not presently provide any advantage in terms of results for woman with normal ovarian reserve; however, they must be considered as a very good therapeutic alternative in poor responders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the embryo culture program and transferring a blastocyst on day 5 increased implantation rates to 32 % in comparison to day 3 transfer (23 %) with a [ 20 ] signifi cant increase in pregnancy rates in addition to a signifi cant decrease in the number of embryos transferred [ 38 ].…”
Section: Vitrifi Cation Of Human Zygotes and Cleaved Embryosmentioning
confidence: 99%